Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="fuindordm" data-source="post: 3716899" data-attributes="member: 5435">I think you've hit the nail on the head. Here's my take on things:Arcane Controller: WizardArcane Defender: (not filled, since arcane magic is supposed to be less peaceful)Arcane Leader: Bard&nbsp; (Optional)Arcane Striker: SorcererDivine Controller: Druid (Definitely--druids=terrain)Divine Defender: PaladinDivine Leader: ClericDivine Striker: (not filled, since divine magic is supposed to be more peaceful.)Martial Controller: (not fillled, it's hard to reach multiple targets without magic)Martial Defender: FighterMartial Leader: WarlordMartial Striker: RangerMartial ??: RogueYou could make a case for the ranger as a divine striker, except that their spells aren't really of the striking variety. I would also vastly prefer a non-spellcasting ranger.Personally, I would add an 'expert' role for those characters who are supposed to be superb generalists.Arcane Expert: Artificer or IllusionistDivine Expert: BinderMartial Expert: RogueAnd finally, it would be great to have a core class that was Martial/Arcane with reduced but still potent spellcasting.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="fuindordm, post: 3716899, member: 5435"] I think you've hit the nail on the head. Here's my take on things: [b]Arcane Controller:[/b] Wizard [b]Arcane Defender:[/b] (not filled, since arcane magic is supposed to be less peaceful) [b]Arcane Leader:[/b] Bard [COLOR=Yellow](Optional)[/COLOR] [b]Arcane Striker:[/b] Sorcerer [b]Divine Controller:[/b] Druid [COLOR=Yellow](Definitely--druids=terrain)[/COLOR] [b]Divine Defender:[/b] Paladin [b]Divine Leader:[/b] Cleric [b]Divine Striker:[/b] (not filled, since divine magic is supposed to be more peaceful.) [b]Martial Controller:[/b] (not fillled, it's hard to reach multiple targets without magic) [b]Martial Defender:[/b] Fighter [b]Martial Leader:[/b] Warlord [b]Martial Striker:[/b] Ranger [b]Martial ??:[/b] Rogue You could make a case for the ranger as a divine striker, except that their spells aren't really of the striking variety. I would also vastly prefer a non-spellcasting ranger. Personally, I would add an 'expert' role for those characters who are supposed to be superb generalists. [B]Arcane Expert:[/B] Artificer or Illusionist [B]Divine Expert:[/B] Binder [B]Martial Expert:[/B] Rogue And finally, it would be great to have a core class that was Martial/Arcane with reduced but still potent spellcasting. [/QUOTE]

Verification