Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 3725312" data-attributes="member: 48965">First, for the record, I never agreed with or disagreed with Devyn's statement.  What I disagree with is the fact that Devyn is talking about the trustworthiness or lack thereof of a company, a singular entity...and mouse seems to want to imply he is questioning the integrity of particular people.  When they make comments or statements in their capacity as representatives of WotC, they are being paid to represent that corporation in the manner which those who run said corporation expect them to.  Whether it is true or false cannot be properly ascertained until actual action is taken.  Until then I see no problem with an opinion(negative or positive) on what they will do from each individuals perspective.This is totally beside the point...Once again they are responding, and being paid as representatives of WotC and may not know the complete vision for D&D 4e themselves.  If they make a false statement because they don't know the actual plan, or have been misinformed themselves...is it any less false?  Where has Devyn posted a specific quote, he has repeatedly given only his own conjecture, which at this point is just as valid as anyone else's.  If you don't agree with him, cool, post a counter argument or ignore him.  But he hasn't broken the CoC so he has a right to express his views of WotC.</blockquote>