Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OchreJelly" data-source="post: 4215946" data-attributes="member: 62056">See this is a sentiment I just don’t understand, but I suppose it’s the nature of the internet: i.e. why people will churn on limited information to begin with?  Sure it’s fun to speculate about what’s coming but to be outright negative about something when you can’t see ‘the whole elephant’ to me is a waste of energy. YMMV of course.I would never expect the devs to course-correct message boards in this fashion because that way leads (madness) to an endless pit of even more questions.  It’s not only a resource issue (sounds like a full-time job to me), but one that causes more problems than it’s worth.  Edit: I didn't want to imply that Garnfellow personally was being negative.  My musings were addressing his musings.  Sorry if it came off as the former.What actually is interesting is now, with the previews, the whole elephant is being revealed a bit at a time.  This is an exciting time, but then again I’m in the camp that says real criticism can begin after a full ruleset has been read and digested.</blockquote>