Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="JohnSnow" data-source="post: 4269309" data-attributes="member: 32164">Sorry, I just don't buy it.I would propose that the stats needed to make this &quot;only miss on a natural 1&quot; are unachievable unless you deliberately make yourself so weak in other areas that you'd never survive the adventure that got you to this point.You're just not going to be able to drop in on an unprepared enemy with no cohorts and one-shot him.If you miss on a 2, instead of just &quot;only on a 1,&quot; the statistics are against you getting past 7 hits (48%). That means, on average, you'd do 7x ([w] + bonus) damage.What I want to know is, if this is so über, then why didn't the CharOp playtesters catch it? We know several of them were involved. Specifically, we were given the following names just a week ago: Andrew Kim, Benjamin Pierce, Brian Dupuis, Edward Kim, Jim Raviolos, Joshua Crowe, Max Gorinevsky, Michel Fiallo-Perez, Nathan Lee, and Megan &quot;WizO Autumn&quot; McGinley.So did they somehow miss it? Or did they perhaps leave it in on purpose? Hmmm?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="JohnSnow, post: 4269309, member: 32164"] Sorry, I just don't buy it. I would propose that the stats needed to make this "only miss on a natural 1" are unachievable unless you deliberately make yourself so weak in other areas that you'd never survive the adventure that got you to this point. You're just not going to be able to drop in on an unprepared enemy with no cohorts and one-shot him. If you miss on a 2, instead of just "only on a 1," the statistics are against you getting past 7 hits (48%). That means, [i]on average,[/i] you'd do 7x ([w] + bonus) damage. What I want to know is, if this is so über, then [i]why didn't the CharOp playtesters catch it?[/i] We know several of them were involved. Specifically, we were given the following names just a week ago: Andrew Kim, Benjamin Pierce, Brian Dupuis, Edward Kim, Jim Raviolos, Joshua Crowe, Max Gorinevsky, Michel Fiallo-Perez, Nathan Lee, and Megan "WizO Autumn" McGinley. So did they somehow miss it? Or did they perhaps leave it in on purpose? Hmmm? [/QUOTE]

Verification