Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 4565211" data-attributes="member: 2525">Well, your answer is similar to several others, so I'd really like to hear how you deal with the obvious complexities of such a ruling.  If you were stopped in an occupied square with your first move, you've clearly broken the movement rules.  This issue is called out in the double move text (you gain an exception to that rule if you double move, because you do not stop with a double move).  How is your interpretation compatible with that issue?Similarly, you can sometimes move through more difficult terrain with a double move, again because (as the double move text says) you do not actually stop with a double move. How is your interpretation, which allows for a stop, compatible with that issue? Finally, the language of Double Move says "One Speed: When you double move, add the speeds of the two move actions together and then move."  Why would you add speeds first, and then move, if they meant you can decide half-way through actually moving if you want to double move or not?A slow effect stops your movement.  Stopping movement is not compatible with several aspects of a double move, and the language of double move does not lend support deciding later if you will move twice.   How are all of those issues dealt with under your interpretation?</blockquote>