Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="JoelF" data-source="post: 4066675" data-attributes="member: 8829">Maybe this is being nitpicky about the language choice, but I didn't like that the article says &quot;the two builds are&quot; since this to me means that there's much less customization in character building, since you only have 2 paths of making a rogue (and presumably other characters will have similar limits.)&nbsp; This also is bad word choice if they plan on having future supplements provide new build options.&nbsp; I also wan't fond of the use of &quot;rogue&quot; in many of the powers - such as rogue tactics, etc.&nbsp; Something more along the lines of the 3E ranger combat styles would be a more generic term.My biggest issue about the article was that sneak attack is limited to a small set of weapons only.&nbsp; Not only does this limit the rogue's options in general (and for reason I fail to see the logic of), but it seems to me that it strongly limits multi-classing (or training), since sure a 4E rogue could learn to use other weapons from multi-classing or feats, etc, but couldn't sneak attack with any of them.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="JoelF, post: 4066675, member: 8829"] Maybe this is being nitpicky about the language choice, but I didn't like that the article says "[B]the[/B] two builds are" since this to me means that there's much less customization in character building, since you only have 2 paths of making a rogue (and presumably other characters will have similar limits.) This also is bad word choice if they plan on having future supplements provide new build options. I also wan't fond of the use of "rogue" in many of the powers - such as rogue tactics, etc. Something more along the lines of the 3E ranger combat styles would be a more generic term. My biggest issue about the article was that sneak attack is limited to a small set of weapons only. Not only does this limit the rogue's options in general (and for reason I fail to see the logic of), but it seems to me that it strongly limits multi-classing (or training), since sure a 4E rogue could learn to use other weapons from multi-classing or feats, etc, but couldn't sneak attack with any of them. [/QUOTE]

Verification