Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Psion" data-source="post: 4096045" data-attributes="member: 172">Replacing touch AC with Reflex saves. The distinction never made sense to me.Removal of iterative/full attacks. AFAIAC, one of the REAL issues with high level D&amp;D.Non randomized hp per level.Death and dying rules cautiously (I like the uncertainty. Not so sure I agree with the deficit-elimination.)Bloodied condition. Never liked that at 1 hp you were as good as full.(I would say buffs; others have mentioned it, the paladin smite convinced me that in-combat tracking was not simpler, but maybe that's why they reportedly said there will be changes from the paladin from what was seen at DDXP.)I notice a lot of my fellow skeptics note many of these as well. That might form a functional guide to a more reasoned measure &quot;3.75&quot; rules fix. Course, a few of these were house rules I already had.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Psion, post: 4096045, member: 172"] Replacing touch AC with Reflex saves. The distinction never made sense to me. Removal of iterative/full attacks. AFAIAC, one of the REAL issues with high level D&D. Non randomized hp per level. Death and dying rules [i]cautiously[/i] (I like the uncertainty. Not so sure I agree with the deficit-elimination.) Bloodied condition. Never liked that at 1 hp you were as good as full. (I would say buffs; others have mentioned it, the paladin smite convinced me that in-combat tracking was not simpler, but maybe that's why they reportedly said there will be changes from the paladin from what was seen at DDXP.) I notice a lot of my fellow skeptics note many of these as well. That might form a functional guide to a more reasoned measure "3.75" rules fix. Course, a few of these were house rules I already had. [/QUOTE]

Verification