Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="glass" data-source="post: 4091076" data-attributes="member: 12251">Where does the idea that 4e is going to be worse for Simulationism than 3e?IMO, at least, the most glaringly anti-simulationist things in 3.x are:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The disconnect between what hp represent when you are taking damamge and what they represent when you are recovering (and different types of recovery are different from each other too).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The fact that if you are wielding a khopesh, it is much easier to trip a fresh enemy with it than it is to cut them.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The use of the same combat manouvre over and over again.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The ability to jump of cliff with no possibility of injury.</li> </ul>From what we have seen, 4e fixes the first three, and makes a (small) step forward with the fourth.glass.</blockquote>