Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
4e skill system -dont get it.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Harr" data-source="post: 4126020" data-attributes="member: 47190"><p>The player's don't know exactly how many rolls either way are needed to succeed or fail, but they know they need noticeably more wins than loses. On my end, for wins/loses I use 3/2 for small quick challenges, and 6/4, 9/6, and 12/8 for larger, more dangerous, or more plot-important scenes.</p><p></p><p>Also, they can only make a roll when the action they describe makes sense, and they don't get to choose the skill directly, (even though that's kinda how I wrote it up there, that's wrong, sorry) they describe the action and I assign a skill that makes sense both to them and to me. They usually can't repeat the same action over and over because it goes without saying that something like that just doesn't make sense.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes. You have a solid point. It seems weird and unrealistic. I just take it as a guide. For me, it's basically the system telling me, 'It's ok dude, they have 6 wins and two losses? They've won enough. Don't worry about it... you can give it to them now. Enough time on this thing; time to move on to something else.' Otherwise, how do I know when to stop the rolling? Are they going to need a roll to catch the corpse? a roll to carry the corpse around? a roll to find a place to bury the corpse? A roll to bury the corpse? A roll to keep talking with the dryad, etc, etc, etc,? When does it stop? This way I know 'ok, right about <em>now</em> would be a good time to wrap it up'. That's the value for me.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Anyway I understand how even with all this there will be people who go, 'so what.' That's cool, but there's really nothing more to it, that's all there is. Just a guideline. Whether it's valuable is up to each DM on an individual basis, IMHO.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Harr, post: 4126020, member: 47190"] The player's don't know exactly how many rolls either way are needed to succeed or fail, but they know they need noticeably more wins than loses. On my end, for wins/loses I use 3/2 for small quick challenges, and 6/4, 9/6, and 12/8 for larger, more dangerous, or more plot-important scenes. Also, they can only make a roll when the action they describe makes sense, and they don't get to choose the skill directly, (even though that's kinda how I wrote it up there, that's wrong, sorry) they describe the action and I assign a skill that makes sense both to them and to me. They usually can't repeat the same action over and over because it goes without saying that something like that just doesn't make sense. Yes. You have a solid point. It seems weird and unrealistic. I just take it as a guide. For me, it's basically the system telling me, 'It's ok dude, they have 6 wins and two losses? They've won enough. Don't worry about it... you can give it to them now. Enough time on this thing; time to move on to something else.' Otherwise, how do I know when to stop the rolling? Are they going to need a roll to catch the corpse? a roll to carry the corpse around? a roll to find a place to bury the corpse? A roll to bury the corpse? A roll to keep talking with the dryad, etc, etc, etc,? When does it stop? This way I know 'ok, right about [i]now[/i] would be a good time to wrap it up'. That's the value for me. Anyway I understand how even with all this there will be people who go, 'so what.' That's cool, but there's really nothing more to it, that's all there is. Just a guideline. Whether it's valuable is up to each DM on an individual basis, IMHO. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
4e skill system -dont get it.
Top