Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
4E: The day the game ate the roleplayer?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 4095594" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>But the system used surely affects the nature of the roleplaying undertaken, doesn't it? A game of Call of Cthulhu would feel pretty different from a game of The Dying Earth, given the completely different play experiences each is designed to deliver.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't really know what "florid text" has to do with roleplaying - in my experience first person descriptions of character action and conversation are certainly not necessary for roleplaying to take place, and not always sufficient either.</p><p></p><p>Surely roleplaying is about taking on a role within the game, and having the game (via its mechanics, including in particular those mechanics that determine who can narrate what) permit the exploration of that role. Monopoly and chess don't become roleplaying games just because I speak in a funny first person voice when I move a piece. A railroaded 2nd ed AD&D module does not become roleplaying just because I speak in a funny first person voice when I describe my PC's (mandated) action.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Neither that I can see.</p><p></p><p>The first is about supporting operational play in which the players directly engage the GM to have their PC's actions resolved successfully. The unit of play, and of success or failure, is either the expedition or the campaign.</p><p></p><p>The second (as far as I can tell from the evidence) is about supporting a very high degree of player control via ultra-tight mechanics. The GM's role will be to provide antagonists as an obstacle to PC protagonism, but the rules seem intended to run themselves.</p><p></p><p>Given that videogames do not support player control at all - the stakes, the themes, the relationship between mechanics and gameworld are all determined by the programmer, not the players - I don't see any deep similarity between 4e and computer games.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The principal thing that distinguishes table-top roleplaying from the computer variety is the capacity for players to control the action, the themes, the stakes, the interpretation of the game experience. Everything about 4e seems intended to enhance all this.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 4095594, member: 42582"] But the system used surely affects the nature of the roleplaying undertaken, doesn't it? A game of Call of Cthulhu would feel pretty different from a game of The Dying Earth, given the completely different play experiences each is designed to deliver. I don't really know what "florid text" has to do with roleplaying - in my experience first person descriptions of character action and conversation are certainly not necessary for roleplaying to take place, and not always sufficient either. Surely roleplaying is about taking on a role within the game, and having the game (via its mechanics, including in particular those mechanics that determine who can narrate what) permit the exploration of that role. Monopoly and chess don't become roleplaying games just because I speak in a funny first person voice when I move a piece. A railroaded 2nd ed AD&D module does not become roleplaying just because I speak in a funny first person voice when I describe my PC's (mandated) action. Neither that I can see. The first is about supporting operational play in which the players directly engage the GM to have their PC's actions resolved successfully. The unit of play, and of success or failure, is either the expedition or the campaign. The second (as far as I can tell from the evidence) is about supporting a very high degree of player control via ultra-tight mechanics. The GM's role will be to provide antagonists as an obstacle to PC protagonism, but the rules seem intended to run themselves. Given that videogames do not support player control at all - the stakes, the themes, the relationship between mechanics and gameworld are all determined by the programmer, not the players - I don't see any deep similarity between 4e and computer games. The principal thing that distinguishes table-top roleplaying from the computer variety is the capacity for players to control the action, the themes, the stakes, the interpretation of the game experience. Everything about 4e seems intended to enhance all this. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
4E: The day the game ate the roleplayer?
Top