Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="eblue562" data-source="post: 4896165" data-attributes="member: 84791">Thanks everyone <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />&nbsp; And like I told Legildur, it's not a problem CaBana. I just want to keep them separate as much as possible.&nbsp; I have a question for both of you (or anyone else in the party who has DM'ed before in a PbP forum); is it ok to have the DM roll for initiative?&nbsp; I'm envisioning a situation where a player might initiate combat and rather than waiting for everyone else to roll, the DM responds with the NPC's action and rolls initiative for everyone to start the order of combat flowing smoothly (rather than waiting for everyone else to post a single line of text with their initiative roll).&nbsp; Is this kosher in a PbP, and would you guys be ok with it if I employed something like that?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="eblue562, post: 4896165, member: 84791"] Thanks everyone :) And like I told Legildur, it's not a problem CaBana. I just want to keep them separate as much as possible. I have a question for both of you (or anyone else in the party who has DM'ed before in a PbP forum); is it ok to have the DM roll for initiative? I'm envisioning a situation where a player might initiate combat and rather than waiting for everyone else to roll, the DM responds with the NPC's action and rolls initiative for everyone to start the order of combat flowing smoothly (rather than waiting for everyone else to post a single line of text with their initiative roll). Is this kosher in a PbP, and would you guys be ok with it if I employed something like that? [/QUOTE]

Verification