Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dungnmaster001" data-source="post: 4378976" data-attributes="member: 72661">hmm assuming smallkiwi's 2 are fighter/pally + ranger we end up with the following roles 2 strikers (ranger, rogue)2 defenders (either 2 fighters or 1 fighter and a pally)1 leader (warlord)1 controller (wizard)Sounds good. Though I'm still willing to switch to cleric if everyone thinks it'll help more than a 2nd defender. If I did we'd have 2 strikers1 defender2 leaders (cleric and I believe the warlord expressed interest in changing to tactical build)1 controllerEither way works for me equally well. Just let me know <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> I like making characters so I've been building them both today just in case. I did change from dragonborn to dwarf though. It made for a more balanced stat distribution for the tank and also for the cleric.Fighter would be Axe and Shield style, Cleric would be focused on healing and staying out of melee.</blockquote>