Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
4E: What we think we know
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Olfactatron" data-source="post: 3704460" data-attributes="member: 18035"><p>4th edition? I really hope it isn't like Saga. I like the complexity and obscurity of D&D. I had exhausted all the interesting builds in Saga in about a week of getting the book. And there are several significant rules changes that don't make sense, such as a full round action including your swift action, that wouldn't work well with certain D&D paradigms. </p><p></p><p>Static defense would also be a big problem if they kept iconic spells such as fireball around. Imagine you nuke a bunch of orcs and tank your roll. They all count as having made their save, as opposed to the current system where it would average out as the orcs each rolled a save. It would be a time saver, to be sure, but I would feel pretty gypped playing a caster if that were the case. </p><p></p><p>Another thing I really hope they avoid is the consolidation of classes into generic fighter/caster/skillguy. And then all fighters/caster/skillguys have the same base stats with only talents to differentiate them. And I really hope they don't go with Skills using the same resource as Feats as you gain levels. </p><p></p><p>There are things I liked about Saga though. The skill consolidation made sense, though pretty much anyone I've talked to went further and clumped climb, jump and swim into a skill called athletics. I liked the extra hitpoints at first level, so you can actually take a hit. Though I would have gone with a flat 20 point bonus rather than with 3xHD, so the d6 classes wouldn't have as big a gap between them and the d10 classes. </p><p></p><p>I think the people who enjoy lots of role-playing with lite rules should play another system. When I want that kind of experience that's what I do. I really enjoy Riddle of Steel and the various incarnations of the White Wolf games. And when I want to challenge myself to build interesting characters that take advantage of obscure synergies I play D&D and I love it. I hope they took gamers like me into account when designing the new system. I'd be really disappointed if everything got too simple.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Olfactatron, post: 3704460, member: 18035"] 4th edition? I really hope it isn't like Saga. I like the complexity and obscurity of D&D. I had exhausted all the interesting builds in Saga in about a week of getting the book. And there are several significant rules changes that don't make sense, such as a full round action including your swift action, that wouldn't work well with certain D&D paradigms. Static defense would also be a big problem if they kept iconic spells such as fireball around. Imagine you nuke a bunch of orcs and tank your roll. They all count as having made their save, as opposed to the current system where it would average out as the orcs each rolled a save. It would be a time saver, to be sure, but I would feel pretty gypped playing a caster if that were the case. Another thing I really hope they avoid is the consolidation of classes into generic fighter/caster/skillguy. And then all fighters/caster/skillguys have the same base stats with only talents to differentiate them. And I really hope they don't go with Skills using the same resource as Feats as you gain levels. There are things I liked about Saga though. The skill consolidation made sense, though pretty much anyone I've talked to went further and clumped climb, jump and swim into a skill called athletics. I liked the extra hitpoints at first level, so you can actually take a hit. Though I would have gone with a flat 20 point bonus rather than with 3xHD, so the d6 classes wouldn't have as big a gap between them and the d10 classes. I think the people who enjoy lots of role-playing with lite rules should play another system. When I want that kind of experience that's what I do. I really enjoy Riddle of Steel and the various incarnations of the White Wolf games. And when I want to challenge myself to build interesting characters that take advantage of obscure synergies I play D&D and I love it. I hope they took gamers like me into account when designing the new system. I'd be really disappointed if everything got too simple. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
4E: What we think we know
Top