Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
[4e] Wizard as good as a Fighter in Standard Melee
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="half-dragon dragon" data-source="post: 4546849" data-attributes="member: 51211"><p>While I think pretty much all of the relevant points have been made already, I think its also relevant to understand some of the underlying design principles of 4e. Namely the change to everything being an attack, and making the math through the levels a linear progression.</p><p></p><p>As I believe was mentioned above, with everything being an attack, each class HAS to be able to hit with their relevant attack (i.e. weapons for martial classes, spells for wizards, etc.). This coupled with the evening of the math led to the standard progression of attack (and everything else) that we see. </p><p></p><p>I agree with what others have said, the 'what' of attacks (the relevant attack bonus) isn't the important part (since everyone needs to be able to hit with their particular tricks), it's the 'how' of attacks that is what's important (the powers, feats, and other modifiers).</p><p></p><p>Personally I just like that I can now make a wizard who may be proficient with the longsword and he can, given a relatively decent str score, actually expect to hit even at higher levels.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="half-dragon dragon, post: 4546849, member: 51211"] While I think pretty much all of the relevant points have been made already, I think its also relevant to understand some of the underlying design principles of 4e. Namely the change to everything being an attack, and making the math through the levels a linear progression. As I believe was mentioned above, with everything being an attack, each class HAS to be able to hit with their relevant attack (i.e. weapons for martial classes, spells for wizards, etc.). This coupled with the evening of the math led to the standard progression of attack (and everything else) that we see. I agree with what others have said, the 'what' of attacks (the relevant attack bonus) isn't the important part (since everyone needs to be able to hit with their particular tricks), it's the 'how' of attacks that is what's important (the powers, feats, and other modifiers). Personally I just like that I can now make a wizard who may be proficient with the longsword and he can, given a relatively decent str score, actually expect to hit even at higher levels. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
[4e] Wizard as good as a Fighter in Standard Melee
Top