Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Rechan" data-source="post: 3967563" data-attributes="member: 54846">Except that putting specialists in the PHB at the expense of more broader classes isn't that great. If they put the Illusionist and the Necromancer in the PHB, then that means two other classes would've got the axe. Who do you think deserves to get the axe, just so we have 3 variant wizards?I'd rather have a broader array at start, and then fine-tune. We all ready know that we're getting a magic book in later 2008. We'll probably see the Swordmage there. Considering how there were 11 classes in the 3e PHB and 8 in the 4e PHB, I think that's a given. But if those 8 classes have les overlap compared to the Holy Not-As-Good-A-Fighter and the Primitive Not-as-Good-A-Fighter and the Woodsy fighter that were in the 3e PHB, I consider that a success.</blockquote>