Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jorunkun" data-source="post: 3995804" data-attributes="member: 57929">I guess my group will play the new modules first, to get a feel for 4e's mechanics (and wrap up our current 3.5 campaign in parallel). Eventually we will start a new campaign, homebrewed around the fluff that comes with the new core books.In my past campaigns, I've always eliminated classes and races to give the campaign a stronger flavor. This time around, I want to go the opposite way and try build something that accommodates every class and race as&nbsp; part of the world's story. I was also quite intrigued by the <a href="http://arsludi.lamemage.com/index.php/78/grand-experiments-west-marches/" target="_blank">West Marches Campaign Experiment</a> described on Ars Ludi - featuring more of a &quot;sandbox&quot;, simulationist approach to the game. I am planning on using a smaller world, with more overland travel, random encounters ... and will roll all my combat dice in the open (no fudging).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jorunkun, post: 3995804, member: 57929"] I guess my group will play the new modules first, to get a feel for 4e's mechanics (and wrap up our current 3.5 campaign in parallel). Eventually we will start a new campaign, homebrewed around the fluff that comes with the new core books. In my past campaigns, I've always eliminated classes and races to give the campaign a stronger flavor. This time around, I want to go the opposite way and try build something that accommodates every class and race as part of the world's story. I was also quite intrigued by the [URL=http://arsludi.lamemage.com/index.php/78/grand-experiments-west-marches/]West Marches Campaign Experiment[/URL] described on Ars Ludi - featuring more of a "sandbox", simulationist approach to the game. I am planning on using a smaller world, with more overland travel, random encounters ... and will roll all my combat dice in the open (no fudging). [/QUOTE]

Verification