Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
4e/WotC: Pro- or Anti- why do you care?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vyvyan Basterd" data-source="post: 5290655" data-attributes="member: 4892"><p>Yes, but targeting new gamers does not mean that WotC believes its older fanbase to be undesired, unimportant, or irrelevant. And attempts to locate quotes to the latter effect typically turn up nothing but one's own perceptions on how they viewed the message.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm not saying you don't <strong>feel</strong> or shouldn't feel undesired, unimportant, or irrelevant. But that is not something WotC has set out to do. At best you and others are infering such from their statements. Inference can lead to the same problems as assuming.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And I don't believe this to be true. They seemed to try to earnestly address issues people were having with the game. They seemed to honestly try to keep the general concept of the game the same while moving into new areas. Asking a company to split its focus and produce two games at once is unrealistic and is by no means a sign that they were leaving anyone behind. I believe they tried their best to make an evocative new edition that players would move to. The fact that you and others did not is no clear sign that they intentionally set out to leave you behind as an acceptable loss. But once you made your decision, what are they to do? Stop their momentum and move backwards (not meaning that 3E is backwards in terms of quality, just in time)? That very well could have been the deathknell of both editions for WotC (other smaller companies like Paizo may have been able to keep going as they are now).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>From what I've read they had phases in mind since the start. The first was bold revisions to the game that would satisfy common problems people had with 3E and bring in players from outside the TTRPG world. The second phase was to bring back players that had lapsed for a long time due to life circumstances. The third seems to be attracting the retro group and simplfying the rules for additional new players. Yes, they still hope to bring you back into the fold. No one's decisions are necessarily permanent. I saw many people posit that there is nothing WotC could do to bring them back. And only gaming extremists could make such an absolute statement. Although the fact that we're here on ENWorld makes us more hardcore fans than the average player. It also makes us very unrepresentive of the community as a whole.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vyvyan Basterd, post: 5290655, member: 4892"] Yes, but targeting new gamers does not mean that WotC believes its older fanbase to be undesired, unimportant, or irrelevant. And attempts to locate quotes to the latter effect typically turn up nothing but one's own perceptions on how they viewed the message. I'm not saying you don't [B]feel[/B] or shouldn't feel undesired, unimportant, or irrelevant. But that is not something WotC has set out to do. At best you and others are infering such from their statements. Inference can lead to the same problems as assuming. And I don't believe this to be true. They seemed to try to earnestly address issues people were having with the game. They seemed to honestly try to keep the general concept of the game the same while moving into new areas. Asking a company to split its focus and produce two games at once is unrealistic and is by no means a sign that they were leaving anyone behind. I believe they tried their best to make an evocative new edition that players would move to. The fact that you and others did not is no clear sign that they intentionally set out to leave you behind as an acceptable loss. But once you made your decision, what are they to do? Stop their momentum and move backwards (not meaning that 3E is backwards in terms of quality, just in time)? That very well could have been the deathknell of both editions for WotC (other smaller companies like Paizo may have been able to keep going as they are now). From what I've read they had phases in mind since the start. The first was bold revisions to the game that would satisfy common problems people had with 3E and bring in players from outside the TTRPG world. The second phase was to bring back players that had lapsed for a long time due to life circumstances. The third seems to be attracting the retro group and simplfying the rules for additional new players. Yes, they still hope to bring you back into the fold. No one's decisions are necessarily permanent. I saw many people posit that there is nothing WotC could do to bring them back. And only gaming extremists could make such an absolute statement. Although the fact that we're here on ENWorld makes us more hardcore fans than the average player. It also makes us very unrepresentive of the community as a whole. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
4e/WotC: Pro- or Anti- why do you care?
Top