Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
4E's New Direction: Giving the game back to the DM.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="P1NBACK" data-source="post: 5293562" data-attributes="member: 83768"><p>Now, before you go crying and rattling off on some hyperbole about how the DM never lost control or that players still have control or whatever, that's not up for debate. </p><p></p><p>My point is, there is a remarkable difference in the tone toward giving DM's control over certain aspects of the game that wasn't as clear previously. With Essentials (based on previews) and notably, my read through of the Dark Sun Campaign Setting book, I'm noticing a new trend that seems to give DM's more options to limit or control material in their campaign. </p><p></p><p>Magic Item Rarity is one of these things, but also the language in the DS Campaign book indicates this as well. Phrases like, "at the DM's option" and such seem to be being used more than in previous 4E books. </p><p></p><p>I personally find this an excellent change of direction. What do you think? </p><p></p><p>Are you noticing the change? Do you think it's for the good or detriment of the game? As a DM, do you like having more <em><strong>explicit </strong></em>control over the game, or no? As a player, do you prefer when the game text gives DM's final authority over the content and rules used? </p><p></p><p>Thoughts?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="P1NBACK, post: 5293562, member: 83768"] Now, before you go crying and rattling off on some hyperbole about how the DM never lost control or that players still have control or whatever, that's not up for debate. My point is, there is a remarkable difference in the tone toward giving DM's control over certain aspects of the game that wasn't as clear previously. With Essentials (based on previews) and notably, my read through of the Dark Sun Campaign Setting book, I'm noticing a new trend that seems to give DM's more options to limit or control material in their campaign. Magic Item Rarity is one of these things, but also the language in the DS Campaign book indicates this as well. Phrases like, "at the DM's option" and such seem to be being used more than in previous 4E books. I personally find this an excellent change of direction. What do you think? Are you noticing the change? Do you think it's for the good or detriment of the game? As a DM, do you like having more [I][B]explicit [/B][/I]control over the game, or no? As a player, do you prefer when the game text gives DM's final authority over the content and rules used? Thoughts? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
4E's New Direction: Giving the game back to the DM.
Top