Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
4th ed, the Good & the Bad?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rallek" data-source="post: 3972319" data-attributes="member: 8463"><p>Leugren, do you take a few levels of mage first to represent the mouser's training during which he earned his name? If so, you can use scrolls and wands and other assorted mystic goodies well before your general rogue's UMD would kick in reliably. So I'd go for using some of those toys, along with the occasional spell or two.</p><p></p><p></p><p>In addition I'm going to call BS on the argument of "my character concept is X literary figure, and the base class is too weak!" in general. So all rogues are now the gray mouser, all barbarians have to be Fafhrd, but they also have to be Conan, Kull, and Beowulf. All sorcerers are Elric, and Merlin, and Harry Potter too... and so on. How does one "balance" the Gray Mouser vs. Conan, or Elric vs. Merlin? </p><p></p><p>Hmmm.... how many skill points does the "Legolas" class get, and is that overpowered compared to my "Cloud Strife" damage bonus?</p><p></p><p></p><p>We can't look to figures from books/movies/games, and try to model them in generic D&D. Why? Because they are from specific settings, with their own internal rules and unique tropes, and often they are mutually incompatible with other specific settings. That's why we're not talking about the unique character of the Gray Mouser, with his own setting specific rules, and history, we're talking about a generic Dungeons and Dragons rogue. Can you use that as a base to build a "Mouser" class? Absolutely, and if that's a concept that you really want to play sit down with your DM and work it out. That's the strength of D&D, by keeping it relatively generic we perserve the flexibility of individual DMs and players to make it their own in the way that best works for them. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Your Gray Mouser and my Fafhrd may fit wonderfully together, and they may rock Nehwon homebrew world number 7 to its very foundations, but they might not fit so snuggly in Hyborea rip-off number 113. So why not leave the options as open as possible by keeping the class a bit more generic? Wouldn't that also qualify as "win-win"?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rallek, post: 3972319, member: 8463"] Leugren, do you take a few levels of mage first to represent the mouser's training during which he earned his name? If so, you can use scrolls and wands and other assorted mystic goodies well before your general rogue's UMD would kick in reliably. So I'd go for using some of those toys, along with the occasional spell or two. In addition I'm going to call BS on the argument of "my character concept is X literary figure, and the base class is too weak!" in general. So all rogues are now the gray mouser, all barbarians have to be Fafhrd, but they also have to be Conan, Kull, and Beowulf. All sorcerers are Elric, and Merlin, and Harry Potter too... and so on. How does one "balance" the Gray Mouser vs. Conan, or Elric vs. Merlin? Hmmm.... how many skill points does the "Legolas" class get, and is that overpowered compared to my "Cloud Strife" damage bonus? We can't look to figures from books/movies/games, and try to model them in generic D&D. Why? Because they are from specific settings, with their own internal rules and unique tropes, and often they are mutually incompatible with other specific settings. That's why we're not talking about the unique character of the Gray Mouser, with his own setting specific rules, and history, we're talking about a generic Dungeons and Dragons rogue. Can you use that as a base to build a "Mouser" class? Absolutely, and if that's a concept that you really want to play sit down with your DM and work it out. That's the strength of D&D, by keeping it relatively generic we perserve the flexibility of individual DMs and players to make it their own in the way that best works for them. Your Gray Mouser and my Fafhrd may fit wonderfully together, and they may rock Nehwon homebrew world number 7 to its very foundations, but they might not fit so snuggly in Hyborea rip-off number 113. So why not leave the options as open as possible by keeping the class a bit more generic? Wouldn't that also qualify as "win-win"? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
4th ed, the Good & the Bad?
Top