Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jhaelen" data-source="post: 4421311" data-attributes="member: 46713">I've always thought of the Paladin as a hybrid class. In 4E it's a defender with a strong secondary leader aspect. I didn't have the impression that a Paladin has considerably more MAD than other classes.Isn't it quite similar to, say, a Star-Pact Warlock? Or do you think that's another badly designed class/build?I'm not saying you're wrong. I guess, you've spent more time analyzing the class than I did. I'm just curious since your stance seems pretty aggressive.If I wanted to play a (pure) defender I'd always play a fighter but that has nothing to do with MAD. It's just that the powers seem to be more useful for the defender role. Depending on the group I could still see myself playing a paladin if it seems to be weak on either the defender or the leader 'front'.</blockquote>