Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Neonchameleon" data-source="post: 5624218" data-attributes="member: 87792">You do understand that this is a 4th edition discussion forum.&nbsp; Not a 4th edition generalised complaint forum for you to offer in banal terms points about 4e that have been discussed to death ever since 4e first came out in 2008 (the supposed similarity between weapons and magic) with no new insights.&nbsp; Oh, and randomised conspiracy theories about 5e.&nbsp; I have criticisms of 4th ed (ask me about Warlock At Wills sometime for example - or double (or even superior) weapons - or psionic classes), some of which were addressed by Essentials (which added tactically simple classes).&nbsp; However I address them in specific terms rather than generalised non-specific terms which are neither helpful to debate nor discussion.&nbsp;&nbsp;You registered last month.&nbsp; In that time you've had more threads you started locked than I think anyone I've seen in my entire history of posting on ENWorld.&nbsp; This should indicate that you're doing something wrong.&nbsp;&nbsp;He's contributed as much that's constructive to this discussion as you have.&nbsp; And about the similarity issue, this is one that's been discussed literally for years.&nbsp; Next you'll be telling us it's a crying shame that they've removed THAC0 from the system.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Neonchameleon, post: 5624218, member: 87792"] You do understand that this is a 4th edition discussion forum. Not a 4th edition generalised complaint forum for you to offer in banal terms points about 4e that have been discussed to death ever since 4e first came out in 2008 (the supposed similarity between weapons and magic) with no new insights. Oh, and randomised conspiracy theories about 5e. I have criticisms of 4th ed (ask me about Warlock At Wills sometime for example - or double (or even superior) weapons - or psionic classes), some of which were addressed by Essentials (which added tactically simple classes). However I address them in specific terms rather than generalised non-specific terms which are neither helpful to debate nor discussion. You registered last month. In that time you've had more threads you started locked than I think anyone I've seen in my entire history of posting on ENWorld. This should indicate that you're doing something wrong. He's contributed as much that's constructive to this discussion as you have. And about the similarity issue, this is one that's been discussed literally for years. Next you'll be telling us it's a crying shame that they've removed THAC0 from the system. [/QUOTE]

Verification