Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Bluenose" data-source="post: 6075466" data-attributes="member: 49017">Which is one of the things that always puzzles me, whether it's 4e or 3e (or any other game for that matter) involved. Why do that? When a game plays in a particular fashion, it seems like a lot of work to change it to play in a different fashion when you could instead play a different game - one that wouldn't need anywhere near the amount of work to make it fit. I don't play 3e for Lankhmar or 4e for Game of Thrones; there are other games that do that well, and leave me time to get the campaign together rather than wrestle the game into submission.Well, they did that with 3e. And plenty of people discovered very quickly that all the claims about how things converted turned out to mean that you could play the same way you always used to and get different results. Or you could play a different way and get different results. But you couldn't get the same results, and the game wasn't the same. At least this time they tried to be honest.</blockquote>