Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
4th edition, The fantastic game that everyone hated.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 6075915" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>Yeah, I'm just not sure I buy the "they hit us with all of this by surprise, it was promised to be 'the same old D&D'" as was proposed. </p><p></p><p>I can only really project my own and to some extent the experience of the people I play with. All the FR, 2e/3e canon, etc never meant beans to us. I started DMing in 1975, you made up your own world. I haven't ever read FR, played in FR, owned anything to do with FR, nor could I give a crud about FR. I could BARELY give a crud about all but the most broad outlines of D&D Cosmology (that there are other planes of existence and they embody various ideals and conditions and that travel to them is both difficult and presents various kinds of adventures). The existence of demons, devils, dragons, and other familiar monsters is pretty useful, but to a first approximation all that exists in 4e. Honestly, where stuff did change, it seemed easier to use and incorporate in stories. </p><p></p><p>Where with previous editions I basically utterly ignored lore beyond monster books basically and maybe some very passing lip service to 1e MotP 4e's lore is really useful and gets incorporated in some fashion fairly often. I spin a lot of stories off riffing on it (though I do have my own spin on a lot of it). </p><p></p><p>So, none of that disturbed me at all. In fact it was highly welcome IMHO. I don't recall hearing any complaints in the groups I play/run games in either. Some local DMs have a bit more invested in older lore, but it seems to me you can just ignore the newer stuff without it being a big issue, and they've done that to the extent I know about. I guess if you are a big FR fan or whatever then maybe there's an issue, clearly it IS an issue to some people. </p><p></p><p>I'm divided about it. Frankly I appreciate the new lore and I think its an improvement and a breath of fresh air. OTOH it probably could have been skipped and maybe there'd have been one less dimension of bloody screaming about 4e. Its all moot now. I am entirely certain I'll keep referring to the new lore in my play and while its possible I'll adopt 5e I don't see it as some needed or even welcome change.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 6075915, member: 82106"] Yeah, I'm just not sure I buy the "they hit us with all of this by surprise, it was promised to be 'the same old D&D'" as was proposed. I can only really project my own and to some extent the experience of the people I play with. All the FR, 2e/3e canon, etc never meant beans to us. I started DMing in 1975, you made up your own world. I haven't ever read FR, played in FR, owned anything to do with FR, nor could I give a crud about FR. I could BARELY give a crud about all but the most broad outlines of D&D Cosmology (that there are other planes of existence and they embody various ideals and conditions and that travel to them is both difficult and presents various kinds of adventures). The existence of demons, devils, dragons, and other familiar monsters is pretty useful, but to a first approximation all that exists in 4e. Honestly, where stuff did change, it seemed easier to use and incorporate in stories. Where with previous editions I basically utterly ignored lore beyond monster books basically and maybe some very passing lip service to 1e MotP 4e's lore is really useful and gets incorporated in some fashion fairly often. I spin a lot of stories off riffing on it (though I do have my own spin on a lot of it). So, none of that disturbed me at all. In fact it was highly welcome IMHO. I don't recall hearing any complaints in the groups I play/run games in either. Some local DMs have a bit more invested in older lore, but it seems to me you can just ignore the newer stuff without it being a big issue, and they've done that to the extent I know about. I guess if you are a big FR fan or whatever then maybe there's an issue, clearly it IS an issue to some people. I'm divided about it. Frankly I appreciate the new lore and I think its an improvement and a breath of fresh air. OTOH it probably could have been skipped and maybe there'd have been one less dimension of bloody screaming about 4e. Its all moot now. I am entirely certain I'll keep referring to the new lore in my play and while its possible I'll adopt 5e I don't see it as some needed or even welcome change. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
4th edition, The fantastic game that everyone hated.
Top