Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
4th edition, The fantastic game that everyone hated.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 6079102" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>Well, we goth enjoyed it. Honestly I didn't find the 4e materials all that uneven at all. My comparison is mostly 1e and 2e stuff, which could be all over the map quality-wise, and not 3.5, so maybe there was a pinnacle of quality that I missed in there <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> (doubtful but still). The whole idea with 4e WAS to get DDI if you wanted to go deeper. DDI (Dungeon and Dragon articles) actually is QUITE high quality, equal in every way to the books generally. It may be "fan submitted" to some limited extent, but if you submitted article pitches you RAPIDLY discovered they were VERY VERY picky and from people like Claudio Pozas (Klaus) posting here often it is pretty apparent that they demanded high quality output and the material went through the same editorial process as all the printed stuff did.</p><p></p><p>They didn't keep throwing out new things. In fact the PHB1 lists all the power sources that would ever exist in the game. If anything they CUT BACK by removing the concept of a 'ki' source and relegating the Shadow (and somewhat the Primordial/Elemental) power sources to secondary status. I know a lot of people are all down on Heroes of Shadow, but I thought it was highly flavorful and quite cool. It wasn't "half-donkeyed" at all, except maybe the Binder. Shadow PCs and Elemental PCs have somewhat less support, sure, but they have as much as other classes had a year in. I don't think it is fair to call that material bad because WotC has the (IMHO bad) idea to stop supplying support for 4e entirely. I'd just point out that they also had every plan to make splat books to support the other classes and more race books, etc, but apparently they weren't lucrative enough, so I'd guess people weren't that interested. PERSONALLY I thought the race books were reaching. The other stuff however was all pretty good. Nothing is flawless but I thought overall the quality of material put out for 4e was and is excellent. The production values are certainly uniformly high, etc. </p><p></p><p>If there's a blot on that it was the HPE series of modules. They suited the nature of the game poorly for the most part. There were some nice ideas in some of them and I know people that built fun adventures out of them, but out of the book they were mostly pretty dismal play experiences that tried to shoehorn a largely dungeon-crawling mode of play into a game that as Pemerton has explained is much better suited to a different style.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 6079102, member: 82106"] Well, we goth enjoyed it. Honestly I didn't find the 4e materials all that uneven at all. My comparison is mostly 1e and 2e stuff, which could be all over the map quality-wise, and not 3.5, so maybe there was a pinnacle of quality that I missed in there ;) (doubtful but still). The whole idea with 4e WAS to get DDI if you wanted to go deeper. DDI (Dungeon and Dragon articles) actually is QUITE high quality, equal in every way to the books generally. It may be "fan submitted" to some limited extent, but if you submitted article pitches you RAPIDLY discovered they were VERY VERY picky and from people like Claudio Pozas (Klaus) posting here often it is pretty apparent that they demanded high quality output and the material went through the same editorial process as all the printed stuff did. They didn't keep throwing out new things. In fact the PHB1 lists all the power sources that would ever exist in the game. If anything they CUT BACK by removing the concept of a 'ki' source and relegating the Shadow (and somewhat the Primordial/Elemental) power sources to secondary status. I know a lot of people are all down on Heroes of Shadow, but I thought it was highly flavorful and quite cool. It wasn't "half-donkeyed" at all, except maybe the Binder. Shadow PCs and Elemental PCs have somewhat less support, sure, but they have as much as other classes had a year in. I don't think it is fair to call that material bad because WotC has the (IMHO bad) idea to stop supplying support for 4e entirely. I'd just point out that they also had every plan to make splat books to support the other classes and more race books, etc, but apparently they weren't lucrative enough, so I'd guess people weren't that interested. PERSONALLY I thought the race books were reaching. The other stuff however was all pretty good. Nothing is flawless but I thought overall the quality of material put out for 4e was and is excellent. The production values are certainly uniformly high, etc. If there's a blot on that it was the HPE series of modules. They suited the nature of the game poorly for the most part. There were some nice ideas in some of them and I know people that built fun adventures out of them, but out of the book they were mostly pretty dismal play experiences that tried to shoehorn a largely dungeon-crawling mode of play into a game that as Pemerton has explained is much better suited to a different style. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
4th edition, The fantastic game that everyone hated.
Top