Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
4th edition's relative rules complexity
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Majoru Oakheart" data-source="post: 3920455" data-attributes="member: 5143"><p>I think it's closer to:</p><p>"I attack with Downward Sword Spiral of Doom. It's strength vs ac. I roll 26 to hit and do 18 points of damage and knock him prone. Next."</p><p>"The enemy attacks you and hits your Reflex with a roll of 22 for 10 damage and you are immobilized by sticky webs."</p><p>"The Paladin smites the enemy, hitting AC 24 for 20 damage and heals the fighter for 15."</p><p>"That knocks the enemy into bloodied state so he teleports over here."</p><p></p><p>It's not that difficult to keep track of, really.</p><p></p><p>Compared to the similar situation in 3.5, which is likely:</p><p>Fighter: "I attack with power attack 4, which is...22 to hit for....let my just figure out...an extra 8 damage....26 damage."</p><p>DM: "The enemy decides to use a spell-like ability...umm...web....over there"</p><p>Player 1: "Keep in mind that web has to be anchored to two surfaces, there aren't two for it to be anchored to there."</p><p>DM: "Right, I forgot about that part of web. Fine, it does it over here instead."</p><p>Player 2: "Is he casting on the defensive? Cause if not, I'm taking my AOO."</p><p>DM: "Sorry, I forgot t say he was, but he is. *rolls* Ok, he made it."</p><p>DM: "Now...everyone make reflex saves."</p><p>*all players roll*</p><p>*all players yell out their totals at the same time, as usual*</p><p>DM: "Whoa...anyone who gets over...17 makes it."</p><p>Player 3: "I fail."</p><p>Player 4: "Me too."</p><p>DM: "Alright...let me just look up web since I can't remember exactly what effects it has."</p><p>*looks up the spell, spends a couple of minutes reading it, then rereading it as it's web and confusing*</p><p>DM: "Ok, so you are entangled if you failed. Plus, you'll have to make strength checks now to move and you can move a different distance depending on how high you roll."</p><p>*and so on*</p><p></p><p>Sure, it means people are going to have to memorize what immobilize and such does, but if they stay common amongst all attacks that do them and there aren't TOO many states, then it should be easy. Especially if immobilize is something like "each round the enemy makes another attack against you and if it hits, you cannot move out of your squares" and not "You can attempt a strength check and for ever 5 it exceeds 15, you can move 5 feet." which is a lot harder to remember."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Majoru Oakheart, post: 3920455, member: 5143"] I think it's closer to: "I attack with Downward Sword Spiral of Doom. It's strength vs ac. I roll 26 to hit and do 18 points of damage and knock him prone. Next." "The enemy attacks you and hits your Reflex with a roll of 22 for 10 damage and you are immobilized by sticky webs." "The Paladin smites the enemy, hitting AC 24 for 20 damage and heals the fighter for 15." "That knocks the enemy into bloodied state so he teleports over here." It's not that difficult to keep track of, really. Compared to the similar situation in 3.5, which is likely: Fighter: "I attack with power attack 4, which is...22 to hit for....let my just figure out...an extra 8 damage....26 damage." DM: "The enemy decides to use a spell-like ability...umm...web....over there" Player 1: "Keep in mind that web has to be anchored to two surfaces, there aren't two for it to be anchored to there." DM: "Right, I forgot about that part of web. Fine, it does it over here instead." Player 2: "Is he casting on the defensive? Cause if not, I'm taking my AOO." DM: "Sorry, I forgot t say he was, but he is. *rolls* Ok, he made it." DM: "Now...everyone make reflex saves." *all players roll* *all players yell out their totals at the same time, as usual* DM: "Whoa...anyone who gets over...17 makes it." Player 3: "I fail." Player 4: "Me too." DM: "Alright...let me just look up web since I can't remember exactly what effects it has." *looks up the spell, spends a couple of minutes reading it, then rereading it as it's web and confusing* DM: "Ok, so you are entangled if you failed. Plus, you'll have to make strength checks now to move and you can move a different distance depending on how high you roll." *and so on* Sure, it means people are going to have to memorize what immobilize and such does, but if they stay common amongst all attacks that do them and there aren't TOO many states, then it should be easy. Especially if immobilize is something like "each round the enemy makes another attack against you and if it hits, you cannot move out of your squares" and not "You can attempt a strength check and for ever 5 it exceeds 15, you can move 5 feet." which is a lot harder to remember." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
4th edition's relative rules complexity
Top