Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
5 Years in: Concentration
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Helldritch" data-source="post: 7925547" data-attributes="member: 6855114"><p>I go by the book on concentration. But I am getting a bit dissatisfied with the mechanic.</p><p></p><p>The pros:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">It is a great balancing factor that prevents number bloating.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Story wise, its a good narrative point. (The evil wizard is concentrating hard on maintaining his hold over you!).</li> </ul><p>The cons</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">It is a bit too much over present on spells. Spells like hunter mark and Hex should not have concentration (and I did remove the concentration aspect as it is a limiting factor that is way too strong)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">It is often combined with spells which already allow a saving throw every round to end the effect. That one is my greatest frustration on concentration. Let's take the hold person. Concentration and a save every round. That makes that spell garbage in the hands of the NPCs as most NPCs have a low spell DC (14 or less for CR 5 or less) which makes it about a two round spell on average (less with bless). I know that the autocrit on helpless opponent is strong, but you need allies for that. With no allies a BBEG will never use such a spell.</li> </ul><p></p><p>I am considering doing something about spells that have both concentration and save every round. I am still unsure of the final form but it will probably look like this:</p><p>As long as you are concentrating on a spell, you can, as a bonus action, reactivate the spell effect on a target that has failed its initial save but succeeded on a subsequent save. If you reactivate your effect, the target will have to make a new saving throw to avoid the effect. If you do not reactivate your spell on the target and there are no other target affected by the spell, the spell ends.</p><p></p><p>In other words this introduces some kind of battle of wills where a PC fights an effect that an enemy is trying to impose on him. If the initial save is failed, that is not the end. You will want to make that enemy lose his concentration for sure. Do you attack the warlord or do you attack the low level cultist concentrating on the hold spell affecting your rogue?</p><p></p><p>Or I will apply the three save to end a duration effect. This is something I do with poison. The ongoing damage of poison is stopped only with three successful save. This has resulted with a lot of anti-poison elixir and neutralize poison potion being bought in my games. Ongoing poison effect is now hated and fear, even if it is only 1d6 of ongoing damage.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Helldritch, post: 7925547, member: 6855114"] I go by the book on concentration. But I am getting a bit dissatisfied with the mechanic. The pros: [LIST] [*]It is a great balancing factor that prevents number bloating. [*]Story wise, its a good narrative point. (The evil wizard is concentrating hard on maintaining his hold over you!). [/LIST] The cons [LIST] [*]It is a bit too much over present on spells. Spells like hunter mark and Hex should not have concentration (and I did remove the concentration aspect as it is a limiting factor that is way too strong) [*]It is often combined with spells which already allow a saving throw every round to end the effect. That one is my greatest frustration on concentration. Let's take the hold person. Concentration and a save every round. That makes that spell garbage in the hands of the NPCs as most NPCs have a low spell DC (14 or less for CR 5 or less) which makes it about a two round spell on average (less with bless). I know that the autocrit on helpless opponent is strong, but you need allies for that. With no allies a BBEG will never use such a spell. [/LIST] I am considering doing something about spells that have both concentration and save every round. I am still unsure of the final form but it will probably look like this: As long as you are concentrating on a spell, you can, as a bonus action, reactivate the spell effect on a target that has failed its initial save but succeeded on a subsequent save. If you reactivate your effect, the target will have to make a new saving throw to avoid the effect. If you do not reactivate your spell on the target and there are no other target affected by the spell, the spell ends. In other words this introduces some kind of battle of wills where a PC fights an effect that an enemy is trying to impose on him. If the initial save is failed, that is not the end. You will want to make that enemy lose his concentration for sure. Do you attack the warlord or do you attack the low level cultist concentrating on the hold spell affecting your rogue? Or I will apply the three save to end a duration effect. This is something I do with poison. The ongoing damage of poison is stopped only with three successful save. This has resulted with a lot of anti-poison elixir and neutralize poison potion being bought in my games. Ongoing poison effect is now hated and fear, even if it is only 1d6 of ongoing damage. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
5 Years in: Concentration
Top