Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
50 Years. The Least Popular Class Is......
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheSword" data-source="post: 9469180" data-attributes="member: 6879661"><p>So Just out of interest I posted this thread about how much better Illusionists are in 2024. <a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/illusionists-better-in-2024.706432/" target="_blank">D&D General - Illusionists better in 2024</a></p><p></p><p>I’m going to be playing one in our new campaign.</p><p></p><p></p><p>So there are a few fundamentals about illusions which people don’t understand - including players - and as a result there is a lot of wariness around them when there doesn’t need to be.</p><p></p><p>The first is that illusions (almost all of them) create <strong>an</strong> object, <strong>a</strong> creature, or some other visible phenomenon.</p><p></p><p>So straight away the idea of conjuring an image of three flanking wolves is out of the picture. You also can’t redecorate a room with the spell because you can only change one object in the room.</p><p></p><p>Now folks often try and get around this by saying their ‘one object’ is a photo-realistic painting with forced perspective and everything that makes it look like the room has been redecorated. For me that’s jank I would expect the DM to deny it because A it tried to do far more than the spell allows by a straight reading, B you can only create what you can cenceive and in a typical medieval campaign photo-realistic paintings don’t exist.</p><p></p><p>In the basis that illusions have been dramatically simplified and thus less powerful the DM should be more confident letting them do what the illusionist wants them to do. With the caveat… major illusion isn’t some catch all gotcha. It’s a tool just like every other spell. I sometimes think people expect an illusion to act as a compulsion and force a creature to act in a certain way. If you do, I think you’re asking to be disappointed.</p><p></p><p>Plausibility should be a thing. If you’re summoning a wolf in the street of a large city folks are going to be more sceptical than if you’re summoning a snarling guard dog.</p><p></p><p>The best way to think of illusions is as a con or hustle. The trick itself is only deployed when circumstance exist to support the illusion. So use your free bonus action minor illusion to make a loud sound of howling come from the corridor behind the BBEG as a distraction and then cast your illusion of the wolf.</p><p></p><p>One thing that’s worth noting is that it is much harder to disbelieve illusions now that you haven’t interacted with. Simply staring at an illusion to work out if it’s real now requires a study check vs your spell DC. Int is rarely a high stat and investigation is a rare skill in my experience.</p><p></p><p>I’ve got a fair DM in [USER=7031143]@GuyBoy[/USER] who will generally let a sensible plan have a chance of success but who like me has little patience for cheap gotchas and grandstanding and encounter with a single low level spell.</p><p></p><p>My approach to illusion will be to have some simple uses for minor illusion which can help in day to day situations and then some more elaborate cons ready to go where the set up required is possible.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheSword, post: 9469180, member: 6879661"] So Just out of interest I posted this thread about how much better Illusionists are in 2024. [URL='https://www.enworld.org/threads/illusionists-better-in-2024.706432/']D&D General - Illusionists better in 2024[/URL] I’m going to be playing one in our new campaign. So there are a few fundamentals about illusions which people don’t understand - including players - and as a result there is a lot of wariness around them when there doesn’t need to be. The first is that illusions (almost all of them) create [B]an[/B] object, [B]a[/B] creature, or some other visible phenomenon. So straight away the idea of conjuring an image of three flanking wolves is out of the picture. You also can’t redecorate a room with the spell because you can only change one object in the room. Now folks often try and get around this by saying their ‘one object’ is a photo-realistic painting with forced perspective and everything that makes it look like the room has been redecorated. For me that’s jank I would expect the DM to deny it because A it tried to do far more than the spell allows by a straight reading, B you can only create what you can cenceive and in a typical medieval campaign photo-realistic paintings don’t exist. In the basis that illusions have been dramatically simplified and thus less powerful the DM should be more confident letting them do what the illusionist wants them to do. With the caveat… major illusion isn’t some catch all gotcha. It’s a tool just like every other spell. I sometimes think people expect an illusion to act as a compulsion and force a creature to act in a certain way. If you do, I think you’re asking to be disappointed. Plausibility should be a thing. If you’re summoning a wolf in the street of a large city folks are going to be more sceptical than if you’re summoning a snarling guard dog. The best way to think of illusions is as a con or hustle. The trick itself is only deployed when circumstance exist to support the illusion. So use your free bonus action minor illusion to make a loud sound of howling come from the corridor behind the BBEG as a distraction and then cast your illusion of the wolf. One thing that’s worth noting is that it is much harder to disbelieve illusions now that you haven’t interacted with. Simply staring at an illusion to work out if it’s real now requires a study check vs your spell DC. Int is rarely a high stat and investigation is a rare skill in my experience. I’ve got a fair DM in [USER=7031143]@GuyBoy[/USER] who will generally let a sensible plan have a chance of success but who like me has little patience for cheap gotchas and grandstanding and encounter with a single low level spell. My approach to illusion will be to have some simple uses for minor illusion which can help in day to day situations and then some more elaborate cons ready to go where the set up required is possible. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
50 Years. The Least Popular Class Is......
Top