Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
5e and the Cheesecake Factory: Explaining Good Enough
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ovinomancer" data-source="post: 8203410" data-attributes="member: 16814"><p>Appeal to authority exists when you say Person A is an authority on X, and they say Y, so Y is correct because A is an authority. This disregards whether Y is part of X, and the entire argument is that because A said it, it's right, based solely on his authority.</p><p></p><p>This doesn't apply if you provide the argument said by A, and rely on it's strength, or if Y is a technical issue and A is a legitimate authority on Y. In this case, you've ignored that the argument was presented while being credited and doesn't rely on the author being right solely based on their authority. And, you've also ignored that the author is actually a well-cited authority on this exact subject matter.</p><p></p><p>What you have done, though, is commit the genetic fallacy, which says that since Person A is horrible in way X, all things Person A says are also horrible.</p><p></p><p>I mean, if you're going to try to use an informal logical fallacy as a means of argument, do try not to commit a different one yourself in the process.</p><p></p><p>EDITL: and [USER=7015332]@PsyzhranV2[/USER] beat me to it. It's what I get for opening the reply window and then being called away and not checking before hitting submit.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ovinomancer, post: 8203410, member: 16814"] Appeal to authority exists when you say Person A is an authority on X, and they say Y, so Y is correct because A is an authority. This disregards whether Y is part of X, and the entire argument is that because A said it, it's right, based solely on his authority. This doesn't apply if you provide the argument said by A, and rely on it's strength, or if Y is a technical issue and A is a legitimate authority on Y. In this case, you've ignored that the argument was presented while being credited and doesn't rely on the author being right solely based on their authority. And, you've also ignored that the author is actually a well-cited authority on this exact subject matter. What you have done, though, is commit the genetic fallacy, which says that since Person A is horrible in way X, all things Person A says are also horrible. I mean, if you're going to try to use an informal logical fallacy as a means of argument, do try not to commit a different one yourself in the process. EDITL: and [USER=7015332]@PsyzhranV2[/USER] beat me to it. It's what I get for opening the reply window and then being called away and not checking before hitting submit. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
5e and the Cheesecake Factory: Explaining Good Enough
Top