Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Skarsgard" data-source="post: 6724976" data-attributes="member: 6787159">Thanks for the level-up CB! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />1. Was the point buy sufficient at character generation? Would you have preferred more points to play with so you had a better build? Something different entirely?27 is fine by me, like the others have stated it makes for some tougher choices2. How did the most recent combat go? Did you like updates after each character's turn? Or do you prefer the old system, where everyone posts actions at will which are then synthesized into one longer adjudication?I have enjoyed it but honestly, whatever works for you best is fine by me. 3. Was the map updated frequently enough during the most recent combat? Too frequently (were the maps a visual distraction)?Maps are great, it saves a lot of time in trying to work out where people can/cannot go4. How's the formatting for the combat posts? Do you like the title that annotates the start of a new round? Should the initiative order be included in each combat post? Do you like the initiative order to go at the top or the bottom of the post?I like the init at the bottom, simply because the map gives me an overview of the situation first.5. Do you like knowing the monsters' hp?Yes!!!!!!!6. Do you like individual or group initiative?I have played in games that do group and it sets up a certain flow to it, I don't mind either or indeed if the DM simply rolls for the lot.7. How's the format of the combat maps? Anything distracting on there? And, specifically, does a combat map need a background, or is plain white ok? Were the alphanumeric grid squares a help?Like the mapThanks for your efforts, truly appreciated.</blockquote>

Verification