Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Character Builds & Optimization
[5e DM Help] Keeping the lid on....what builds should I NOT allow?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tglassy" data-source="post: 6958806" data-attributes="member: 6855204"><p>I've always disagreed with this. Perhaps for pure combat, multiclassing weakens you, but none of my multiclassed characters ever felt weak to me. They felt fleshed out. People change, they grow, they become something else than they decided to when they were 18. Deals are made. Alliances forged. Weaknesses revealed that the character wants to improve upon. The Sorcerer who decides they are tired of always being weak and frail, so they start training to be a Fighter. The Bard who wants to play music better than anyone, then finds himself face to face with a Devil that can make it happen. The Barbarian who realizes he was called to be the servant of his god, thus becoming a Cleric. Or paladin. Or whatever. </p><p></p><p>These characters are fun. Doing it on a metagaming basis, sure they're a pain. You have to focus pretty hard on making it work from a numbers standpoint. "Do I want the extra attack, or should I just take the levels in Monk now?" My brother had that option. He was an Eldridge Knight, and after the first four levels, they had some downtime before they actually grew to level 5. He said his character went North, found a monastery and started training to control his inner magic (we had the Eldritdg Knight powers be Sorcerer based instead of Wizard). I told him about the Monk's Way of the Four Elements, and he said it was perfect, so now his Fighter 4 is a Monk 1, and is training to get those powers. That's how he interoperates "Control his inner magic". So he loves his character even more, even if he doesn't have the second attack that the party's Paladin and Battle Master have, and even the Party's Bladesinger will have at level 6. It's not power gaming. It's just gaming. Making whatever decision is important to the player. And he hasn't shown any indication that he feels left out as far as damage is concerned, because he loves his character. </p><p></p><p>I had a Rogue Warlock that I loved. He was a master at manipulating people. He was great out of combat. Basically the party face, using Silent Image to wreak all kinds of havoc. But he sucked at fighting. And I didn't really care. He was good enough, and used his intellect more than his fighting skills. </p><p></p><p>It can work. It does work. You don't have to 'keep up with the Joneses' to have a good time. Let them play their character, and during the course of the game, if it makes sense for them to multiclass, let them multiclass. If their Barbarian decides he is connected to nature, and wants to become his totem spirit in body, then let him multiclass a few levels in Druid as he becomes attune to nature. That's awesome. </p><p></p><p>Now, if they're just taking multiclasses to fulfill a build, and to metagame, that's different. As it was said before, if there's no reason to become a paladin, then don't allow that. It's not in the game. I would only allow mutliclassing (if starting at level 1) if it made sense in game. If starting at higher levels, you have to justify why your character has these different classes. But I never completely disallow it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tglassy, post: 6958806, member: 6855204"] I've always disagreed with this. Perhaps for pure combat, multiclassing weakens you, but none of my multiclassed characters ever felt weak to me. They felt fleshed out. People change, they grow, they become something else than they decided to when they were 18. Deals are made. Alliances forged. Weaknesses revealed that the character wants to improve upon. The Sorcerer who decides they are tired of always being weak and frail, so they start training to be a Fighter. The Bard who wants to play music better than anyone, then finds himself face to face with a Devil that can make it happen. The Barbarian who realizes he was called to be the servant of his god, thus becoming a Cleric. Or paladin. Or whatever. These characters are fun. Doing it on a metagaming basis, sure they're a pain. You have to focus pretty hard on making it work from a numbers standpoint. "Do I want the extra attack, or should I just take the levels in Monk now?" My brother had that option. He was an Eldridge Knight, and after the first four levels, they had some downtime before they actually grew to level 5. He said his character went North, found a monastery and started training to control his inner magic (we had the Eldritdg Knight powers be Sorcerer based instead of Wizard). I told him about the Monk's Way of the Four Elements, and he said it was perfect, so now his Fighter 4 is a Monk 1, and is training to get those powers. That's how he interoperates "Control his inner magic". So he loves his character even more, even if he doesn't have the second attack that the party's Paladin and Battle Master have, and even the Party's Bladesinger will have at level 6. It's not power gaming. It's just gaming. Making whatever decision is important to the player. And he hasn't shown any indication that he feels left out as far as damage is concerned, because he loves his character. I had a Rogue Warlock that I loved. He was a master at manipulating people. He was great out of combat. Basically the party face, using Silent Image to wreak all kinds of havoc. But he sucked at fighting. And I didn't really care. He was good enough, and used his intellect more than his fighting skills. It can work. It does work. You don't have to 'keep up with the Joneses' to have a good time. Let them play their character, and during the course of the game, if it makes sense for them to multiclass, let them multiclass. If their Barbarian decides he is connected to nature, and wants to become his totem spirit in body, then let him multiclass a few levels in Druid as he becomes attune to nature. That's awesome. Now, if they're just taking multiclasses to fulfill a build, and to metagame, that's different. As it was said before, if there's no reason to become a paladin, then don't allow that. It's not in the game. I would only allow mutliclassing (if starting at level 1) if it made sense in game. If starting at higher levels, you have to justify why your character has these different classes. But I never completely disallow it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Character Builds & Optimization
[5e DM Help] Keeping the lid on....what builds should I NOT allow?
Top