Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
5e Dragonmarks thematically problematic?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Crimson Binome" data-source="post: 6555054" data-attributes="member: 6775031"><p>It's not fair if the DM knows the rules of the game and the players don't. That's aside from the issue of inherent meaning and how the world <em>actually</em> works. You can represent PCs and NPCs differently, such as to simplify bookkeeping for yourself, but it still needs to be in a way that the players can understand based on their knowledge of how things work.</p><p>I completely disagree, because it's an established fact of the world that you need at least X number of hit dice before you cast Y level of spells. As a player, I know that to be true, based on every piece of information available to me. </p><p></p><p>If you want to change that, as the DM, then you're saying that the world doesn't actually work how I believe it to work. Which is fine, and there are nothing wrong with house rules, as long as everyone agrees to them. But you can't tell me that it works one way for this NPC, and my PC can't do the same thing, unless there's an in-game reason for it. The rules don't support a reality where PCs and NPCs are <em>actually</em> different, because PC vs NPC isn't a status which the game world can possibly recognize.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Crimson Binome, post: 6555054, member: 6775031"] It's not fair if the DM knows the rules of the game and the players don't. That's aside from the issue of inherent meaning and how the world [I]actually[/I] works. You can represent PCs and NPCs differently, such as to simplify bookkeeping for yourself, but it still needs to be in a way that the players can understand based on their knowledge of how things work. I completely disagree, because it's an established fact of the world that you need at least X number of hit dice before you cast Y level of spells. As a player, I know that to be true, based on every piece of information available to me. If you want to change that, as the DM, then you're saying that the world doesn't actually work how I believe it to work. Which is fine, and there are nothing wrong with house rules, as long as everyone agrees to them. But you can't tell me that it works one way for this NPC, and my PC can't do the same thing, unless there's an in-game reason for it. The rules don't support a reality where PCs and NPCs are [I]actually[/I] different, because PC vs NPC isn't a status which the game world can possibly recognize. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
5e Dragonmarks thematically problematic?
Top