Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Duan'duliir" data-source="post: 6799273" data-attributes="member: 6802320">I don't believe that that would be a problem. I just forgot advantage when typing that up.It would need some tweaking to fit in 5e if you did go with moonfire. I think it may be better to go with that then making drow have to pick something else though.It could potentially be an optional variant, so players can choose to stick to the original cleric casting stat or take on Charisma as their casting stat.Perhaps rather than just giving the Charisma (Performance) modifier, giving how much they succeed a DC 15 check by (i.e if they have CHA 16 and prof 2 and roll a 12 for a total of 17, they get a +2 modifier). DC may need tweaking. It may just be my players, but they don't want anything more complex then that.I didn't realise there were no racial restrictions on this (The wiki link you provided indicated otherwise - elves and half-elves only, essentially), so go ahead and leave the charm there. d6 may be too powerful, but the only way to find out is to test the subclass alongside another cleric.Well, comparing it to a Dancing Sword, which has a rarity of very rare, and doesn't have the parry, and the fact that this is a level 17 feature, I would suggest that 4 rounds would be about right. That way, they aren't complaining that the dancing sword that was found in dungeon loot at level 11 dances for longer, but also makes it not incredibly better because you can have it parry for ages. 4 rounds might be too short, but definitely no less than 4 rounds.Alternatively, you could tie it to their spellcasting ability so if they have a wisdom of 18 (if they use wisdom for spellcasting) they get 4 rounds, but with a wisdom of 20, it lasts 5 rounds. Subbing in charisma rather than wisdom if they use charisma of course</blockquote>

Verification