Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
5e Fighters, two-weapon fighting and extra attacks
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kobold Stew" data-source="post: 6732970" data-attributes="member: 23484"><p>First, welcome to the boards! </p><p></p><p>I'm going to give a rules-as-written reading, fully aware that most DMs wouldn't care at all given the way you've tricked out your fighter.</p><p></p><p>The basics have been covered, and the list from pdegan is perhaps clearest. There are just a few small nuances I'd like to point out:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Technically, there no longer is "off-hand" attacks. That is to say, when you take the attack action, you can use either weapon in either hand. If you've only used one weapon in the attack action, the bonus attack can be made with the other hand. </p><p></p><p>This becomes relevant after level 5 if there are magical properties on different weapons (let's say "flame" and "frost", both being non-heavy, since you have the feat; light if you didn't; we could equally say piercing and bludgeoning or whatever).</p><p> </p><p>With extra attack, Attack action lets you attack twice. It can be with flame, or frost, or one with each.</p><p>If both those attacks are with a single weapon (e.g. flame), you meet the criteria for two weapon fighting (which requires the attack action to use only one hand and one weapon), using frost.</p><p></p><p>If you then use Actionsurge, it can be with either flame or frost (but no bonus action, since you've attacked that way already).</p><p></p><p>So a level 5 TWF fighter using action surge could make</p><p>* 2 fire 1 frost 2 fire attacks</p><p>* 2 fire 1 frost 1 fire 1 frost</p><p>* 2 fire 2 frost [bonus and the first attack of the surge] 1 fire </p><p>* 2 fire 3 frost</p><p>* 1 fire 1 frost 2 fire 1 frost [saving the bonus until the end, riding the surge]</p><p>* 1 fire 3 frost 1 fire [bonus at end]</p><p>* 4 fire 1 frost [bonus at end]</p><p>* 1 fire 1 frost 1 fire 1 frost [but no bonus action, since no attack action used only one weapon]</p><p>* 3 fire 1 frost [no bonus]</p><p></p><p>(or any of the above nine possibilities, swapping fire and frost and vice versa). </p><p></p><p>But you can't make:</p><p>* 1 fire 2 frost 1 fire 1 frost</p><p>* 1 fire 2 frost 2 fire</p><p>* 5 fire</p><p>* 3 fire 2 frost</p><p>* 1 fire 1 frost 1 fire 1 frost 1 fire.</p><p>(or again any of these swapping fire for frost, swapping fire for frost)</p><p></p><p>Is that all the permutations? I think so. </p><p></p><p>Ultimately, though, You're pretty flexible, and have a lot of options, and most tables won't care one way or another.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>To this, I would suggest that not everyone cares about DPR, and that it is perfectly possible to enjoy D&D without maximizing damage. </p><p></p><p>DPR in this case, though, is positively misleading -- TWF gives you flexibility, and the ability to move onto additional targets as you wish after each roll of the die, which means that the damage you are doing is much more efficiently applied than it would be with two great weapon attacks. </p><p></p><p>Both are completely legitimate approaches, but it is wrong to say that falling behind in average damage means anything in actual play: the type of opponents you are facing, their number, and whether you have magic weapons (and whether they are light, or heavy), and whether they do different types of damage, are all relevant variables that simply cannot be controlled by theorizing alone. </p><p></p><p>Stick with your character, and have fun.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kobold Stew, post: 6732970, member: 23484"] First, welcome to the boards! I'm going to give a rules-as-written reading, fully aware that most DMs wouldn't care at all given the way you've tricked out your fighter. The basics have been covered, and the list from pdegan is perhaps clearest. There are just a few small nuances I'd like to point out: Technically, there no longer is "off-hand" attacks. That is to say, when you take the attack action, you can use either weapon in either hand. If you've only used one weapon in the attack action, the bonus attack can be made with the other hand. This becomes relevant after level 5 if there are magical properties on different weapons (let's say "flame" and "frost", both being non-heavy, since you have the feat; light if you didn't; we could equally say piercing and bludgeoning or whatever). With extra attack, Attack action lets you attack twice. It can be with flame, or frost, or one with each. If both those attacks are with a single weapon (e.g. flame), you meet the criteria for two weapon fighting (which requires the attack action to use only one hand and one weapon), using frost. If you then use Actionsurge, it can be with either flame or frost (but no bonus action, since you've attacked that way already). So a level 5 TWF fighter using action surge could make * 2 fire 1 frost 2 fire attacks * 2 fire 1 frost 1 fire 1 frost * 2 fire 2 frost [bonus and the first attack of the surge] 1 fire * 2 fire 3 frost * 1 fire 1 frost 2 fire 1 frost [saving the bonus until the end, riding the surge] * 1 fire 3 frost 1 fire [bonus at end] * 4 fire 1 frost [bonus at end] * 1 fire 1 frost 1 fire 1 frost [but no bonus action, since no attack action used only one weapon] * 3 fire 1 frost [no bonus] (or any of the above nine possibilities, swapping fire and frost and vice versa). But you can't make: * 1 fire 2 frost 1 fire 1 frost * 1 fire 2 frost 2 fire * 5 fire * 3 fire 2 frost * 1 fire 1 frost 1 fire 1 frost 1 fire. (or again any of these swapping fire for frost, swapping fire for frost) Is that all the permutations? I think so. Ultimately, though, You're pretty flexible, and have a lot of options, and most tables won't care one way or another. To this, I would suggest that not everyone cares about DPR, and that it is perfectly possible to enjoy D&D without maximizing damage. DPR in this case, though, is positively misleading -- TWF gives you flexibility, and the ability to move onto additional targets as you wish after each roll of the die, which means that the damage you are doing is much more efficiently applied than it would be with two great weapon attacks. Both are completely legitimate approaches, but it is wrong to say that falling behind in average damage means anything in actual play: the type of opponents you are facing, their number, and whether you have magic weapons (and whether they are light, or heavy), and whether they do different types of damage, are all relevant variables that simply cannot be controlled by theorizing alone. Stick with your character, and have fun. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
5e Fighters, two-weapon fighting and extra attacks
Top