Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
5e Flanking - the good, the bad, and the broken?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ECMO3" data-source="post: 8433319" data-attributes="member: 7030563"><p>Yes, cartoonish you often end up with a line enemy-PC-enemy-PC-Enemy-PC then the next enemy to join move behind the PC on the back to get advantage. Eventually you hit a wall or shrub or something and that is what stops the practice.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Mathematically It is a huge nerf. Disadvantage with a high AC will reduce the chance to hit by up to 95% over a straight roll. Blur or invisibility with a target 20 to hit takes the chance to hit from 5% to 0.25% or one hit in every 400 rolls. Give out advantage to flatten it and it is back to 5%. You will literally get hit 20 times as often. That is a far bigger impact than going from normal to advantage in the same situation where you will only get hit about twice as often.</p><p></p><p>To put this math in perspective if you face 100 enemy attacks over the coarse of a day that do 1d8dmg each while you are invisible with a 20 to hit your AC, on average you will take 2 points of damage if the enemy has disadvantage and 45 points of damage on average if he doesn't. That is a HUGE nerf.</p><p></p><p>WRT the Barbarian, you are taking the key feature and giving a lot of it to everyone. Yes, a Barbarian can still use it solo, but much of the time everyone can easily do something only he could do. This is even worse when you consider Barbarian is an underpowered class compared to the Paladin, Fighter and Tasha's Ranger.</p><p></p><p>Why would a monk use patient defense instead of simply attacking with advantage or taking disengage as a bonus action and moving out of range (since their move is higher than everyone else's).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>My big thing is it does not improve the game at all. I have played a lot of games both ways and IME it brings nothing at all to the table IME. You want advantage use the help action or shove prone or come up with something creative. They can still get advantage, even at will, it just takes away and attack or an action to do it. That is what smart monsters will do in the example with invisibility that I used above, instead of just moving to the end of the congo line.</p><p></p><p>YMMV, but I think in general more people who have used it have had bad experiences than have had good.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ECMO3, post: 8433319, member: 7030563"] Yes, cartoonish you often end up with a line enemy-PC-enemy-PC-Enemy-PC then the next enemy to join move behind the PC on the back to get advantage. Eventually you hit a wall or shrub or something and that is what stops the practice. Mathematically It is a huge nerf. Disadvantage with a high AC will reduce the chance to hit by up to 95% over a straight roll. Blur or invisibility with a target 20 to hit takes the chance to hit from 5% to 0.25% or one hit in every 400 rolls. Give out advantage to flatten it and it is back to 5%. You will literally get hit 20 times as often. That is a far bigger impact than going from normal to advantage in the same situation where you will only get hit about twice as often. To put this math in perspective if you face 100 enemy attacks over the coarse of a day that do 1d8dmg each while you are invisible with a 20 to hit your AC, on average you will take 2 points of damage if the enemy has disadvantage and 45 points of damage on average if he doesn't. That is a HUGE nerf. WRT the Barbarian, you are taking the key feature and giving a lot of it to everyone. Yes, a Barbarian can still use it solo, but much of the time everyone can easily do something only he could do. This is even worse when you consider Barbarian is an underpowered class compared to the Paladin, Fighter and Tasha's Ranger. Why would a monk use patient defense instead of simply attacking with advantage or taking disengage as a bonus action and moving out of range (since their move is higher than everyone else's). My big thing is it does not improve the game at all. I have played a lot of games both ways and IME it brings nothing at all to the table IME. You want advantage use the help action or shove prone or come up with something creative. They can still get advantage, even at will, it just takes away and attack or an action to do it. That is what smart monsters will do in the example with invisibility that I used above, instead of just moving to the end of the congo line. YMMV, but I think in general more people who have used it have had bad experiences than have had good. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
5e Flanking - the good, the bad, and the broken?
Top