Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Scrivener of Doom" data-source="post: 6303515" data-attributes="member: 87576">It reminds me of some of the reports about TSR during the 2E years where some (many?) of the designers didn't actually play D&D and wrote for it anyway. The impression I got from a lot of the WotC team toward the end - with a few exceptions such as Chris Perkins and Rich Baker (and how did that guy get laid off considering some of the people they kept?) - basically didn't grok or even like 4E and were just punching time cards until it died. (And H3 was inexcusably poor. How that passed through any sort of development or QC process is a damning indictment of WotC's management at the time.)At least with Next it's clear that Mike Mearls et al actually seem to be enthused about this game possibly because it plays more like AD&D.Anyway, even though I remain committed to 4E, as a fan of FR and Wolfgang Baur's work I'm still looking forward to these adventures. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>