Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Arnwolf" data-source="post: 6719494" data-attributes="member: 6801413">I really have no problem with 3.x concentration, it is a completely different animal than 5E.&nbsp; It really makes sense to me to draw an AOO for casting a spell next to an adjacent enemy and losing the spell if you take damage.&nbsp; But generally I am looking at BECMI-2.0 but very open to anything 3.x.&nbsp; I think basically my dream game is a Blend of PF and 5E.&nbsp; I think PF has very cool classes like the Alchemist, Witch, Magus, and interesting wizard specialists (though I like some in 5E too).&nbsp; I was just wondering if anyone was playing 5E without the concentration mechanic, and was curious how they had to tweak certain spells around.I think many of my problems will be solved as new spells are created that allow the wizard to do useful things.&nbsp; I could be wrong on this.&nbsp; 5E has a very good magic system, just not quite want I like.&nbsp; Very good use of reaction spells.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Arnwolf, post: 6719494, member: 6801413"] I really have no problem with 3.x concentration, it is a completely different animal than 5E. It really makes sense to me to draw an AOO for casting a spell next to an adjacent enemy and losing the spell if you take damage. But generally I am looking at BECMI-2.0 but very open to anything 3.x. I think basically my dream game is a Blend of PF and 5E. I think PF has very cool classes like the Alchemist, Witch, Magus, and interesting wizard specialists (though I like some in 5E too). I was just wondering if anyone was playing 5E without the concentration mechanic, and was curious how they had to tweak certain spells around. I think many of my problems will be solved as new spells are created that allow the wizard to do useful things. I could be wrong on this. 5E has a very good magic system, just not quite want I like. Very good use of reaction spells. [/QUOTE]

Verification