Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
5e Planescape- What would you like to see in the upcoming setting?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Faolyn" data-source="post: 8986711" data-attributes="member: 6915329"><p>They're not going to reduce the number of upper planes unless they get rid of all the dual-alignment planes, because they like their symmetry. Which, theoretically, they could do--they've basically ignored all the lower planes in favor of the Abyss and Nine Hells already. Since they have already blended the para/quasi-elemental planes into the basic four elemental planes, I wouldn't be surprised if Pandamonium, Carceri, Gehenna, and Acheron got blended into other planes: Pandemonium (and Ysgard) and Carceri (and Bytopia) can become part of Limbo and Mechanus, respectively, and Genenna and Acheron can become part of the Abyss and Nine Hells.</p><p></p><p>I'm of two minds about that, myself. I actually prefer those dual-aligned planes to the Abyss and Hells; I find them a lot more interesting and wouldn't want them to be removed or mixed in with another plane. Heck, I'd be happy if the Abyss and Hells were totally downplayed, simply because I find them really boring (I know they won't be, though). On the other hand, I know that, if I were to run a Planescape game, I'd completely change the planes around to be more to my liking <em>anyway</em>, and my idea is closer to what I think 4e did, with individual domains claimed by deities and arch-whatevers or just naturally-formed bits of weirdness, than anything like the Great Wheel. After all, I don't need both a Limbo <em>and </em>an Elemental Chaos, after all. But that's me; probably some people like them both.</p><p></p><p>While there are still planes and layers named after parts of real-world religions and mythologies, I think it might be more important to simply remove the real-world <em>gods</em> from the setting. Or at least the real-world gods that haven't been co-opted into a D&D religion, like Bahamut and Loviatar. What I would like to see is them come up with a brand new bunch of gods to fill in the blanks where the real gods had been used previously. Not just renaming the real gods into something more fantastic, but literally new gods.</p><p></p><p>(Sadly, though, the book is going to be 96 pages long; there's no way they'll come up with a new grouping of gods, even if they only gave them each a 1-sentence description.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Faolyn, post: 8986711, member: 6915329"] They're not going to reduce the number of upper planes unless they get rid of all the dual-alignment planes, because they like their symmetry. Which, theoretically, they could do--they've basically ignored all the lower planes in favor of the Abyss and Nine Hells already. Since they have already blended the para/quasi-elemental planes into the basic four elemental planes, I wouldn't be surprised if Pandamonium, Carceri, Gehenna, and Acheron got blended into other planes: Pandemonium (and Ysgard) and Carceri (and Bytopia) can become part of Limbo and Mechanus, respectively, and Genenna and Acheron can become part of the Abyss and Nine Hells. I'm of two minds about that, myself. I actually prefer those dual-aligned planes to the Abyss and Hells; I find them a lot more interesting and wouldn't want them to be removed or mixed in with another plane. Heck, I'd be happy if the Abyss and Hells were totally downplayed, simply because I find them really boring (I know they won't be, though). On the other hand, I know that, if I were to run a Planescape game, I'd completely change the planes around to be more to my liking [I]anyway[/I], and my idea is closer to what I think 4e did, with individual domains claimed by deities and arch-whatevers or just naturally-formed bits of weirdness, than anything like the Great Wheel. After all, I don't need both a Limbo [I]and [/I]an Elemental Chaos, after all. But that's me; probably some people like them both. While there are still planes and layers named after parts of real-world religions and mythologies, I think it might be more important to simply remove the real-world [I]gods[/I] from the setting. Or at least the real-world gods that haven't been co-opted into a D&D religion, like Bahamut and Loviatar. What I would like to see is them come up with a brand new bunch of gods to fill in the blanks where the real gods had been used previously. Not just renaming the real gods into something more fantastic, but literally new gods. (Sadly, though, the book is going to be 96 pages long; there's no way they'll come up with a new grouping of gods, even if they only gave them each a 1-sentence description.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
5e Planescape- What would you like to see in the upcoming setting?
Top