Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="5ekyu" data-source="post: 7378903" data-attributes="member: 6919838">We are ***literally*** discussing the meaning of rules and the difference in definition of round and turn and what results come from that.I do not think one can get more &quot;semantic&quot; than that, can you?Semantic - relating to meaning in language or logic.???But back to the key bits...Did anyone say you could get w every round? If so i did not see that. But someone did say you can only get one in a round and said it was in the PHB. That was what i was referring to, that direct statement, not your new &quot;every turn&quot; notion.And the reason this is key is that in DnD 5e use of round and turn as if they are interchangeable (say by rephrasing the reaction &quot;turn&quot; reset as if it was &quot;round&quot; limitation) can cause a lot of problems.For a rogue, the &quot;turn&quot; limitation on their sneak attack is big but if the same GM who though reactions were &quot;per round&quot; also made the same screw up for sneak, that would hurt as getting a second sneak in is a good strategy one can work towards - as long as your gm knows the &quot;semantic&quot; difference between turn and round in 5e.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="5ekyu, post: 7378903, member: 6919838"] We are ***literally*** discussing the meaning of rules and the difference in definition of round and turn and what results come from that. I do not think one can get more "semantic" than that, can you? Semantic - relating to meaning in language or logic. ??? But back to the key bits... Did anyone say you could get w every round? If so i did not see that. But someone did say you can only get one in a round and said it was in the PHB. That was what i was referring to, that direct statement, not your new "every turn" notion. And the reason this is key is that in DnD 5e use of round and turn as if they are interchangeable (say by rephrasing the reaction "turn" reset as if it was "round" limitation) can cause a lot of problems. For a rogue, the "turn" limitation on their sneak attack is big but if the same GM who though reactions were "per round" also made the same screw up for sneak, that would hurt as getting a second sneak in is a good strategy one can work towards - as long as your gm knows the "semantic" difference between turn and round in 5e. [/QUOTE]

Verification