Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Character Builds & Optimization
5e. Repeling blast nerfed in our game. Help me to rebuild my Bard-Lock
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Antarx" data-source="post: 7034968" data-attributes="member: 6699371"><p>Well, I was talking about magical darkness, casted on myself in melee . If I remember correctly, almost all the characters on the party are humans (for the bonus feat, I suppose) so they will have disadvantage on melee attacks even in normal darkness, and the ranged characters will be unable to attack creatures within the darkness sphere. Disadvantage for allies and enemies alike, except for me... mmm... well. It's a interesting backup plan, but I'll probably get better final results buffing my party instead on. As you said, there are better spells out there.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Aside all of this, all of this is not (at least, entirely) my dms fault. I don't share my Dm's decision, but I understand it. The rules are (unnecessarily) unclear about some things. Specific trumps general, but nowhere over the invocations descriptions it says that the repelling blast is a specific scenario in terms of saving throws. Also, as my dm says, a single lvl 2 warlock can dismount from his horse another lvl 20 character without any defensive roll (aside of the roll to hit). Or will the invocation move both the rider and the mount? It will be different if the rider rides a magic carpet? Nobody knows for sure, because because he rules are just condensed in 3 poorly defined lines, leaving "everything else" at the GMs hand. </p><p>He had the final word about what is supposed to do in those scenarios... and he make his decision. I think that he is wrong, but at least, I can say that he is fair: He changed the rule, and he allowed me to redo my character in consequence. I can accept that.</p><p></p><p>I believe that WotC is trying to avoid pinching their fingers again with RAW and rules lawyers as in past editions, but, really, It will cost they nothing to add a few lines filling those gaps in the "supposed "or "intended" functioning of all those things.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Antarx, post: 7034968, member: 6699371"] Well, I was talking about magical darkness, casted on myself in melee . If I remember correctly, almost all the characters on the party are humans (for the bonus feat, I suppose) so they will have disadvantage on melee attacks even in normal darkness, and the ranged characters will be unable to attack creatures within the darkness sphere. Disadvantage for allies and enemies alike, except for me... mmm... well. It's a interesting backup plan, but I'll probably get better final results buffing my party instead on. As you said, there are better spells out there. Aside all of this, all of this is not (at least, entirely) my dms fault. I don't share my Dm's decision, but I understand it. The rules are (unnecessarily) unclear about some things. Specific trumps general, but nowhere over the invocations descriptions it says that the repelling blast is a specific scenario in terms of saving throws. Also, as my dm says, a single lvl 2 warlock can dismount from his horse another lvl 20 character without any defensive roll (aside of the roll to hit). Or will the invocation move both the rider and the mount? It will be different if the rider rides a magic carpet? Nobody knows for sure, because because he rules are just condensed in 3 poorly defined lines, leaving "everything else" at the GMs hand. He had the final word about what is supposed to do in those scenarios... and he make his decision. I think that he is wrong, but at least, I can say that he is fair: He changed the rule, and he allowed me to redo my character in consequence. I can accept that. I believe that WotC is trying to avoid pinching their fingers again with RAW and rules lawyers as in past editions, but, really, It will cost they nothing to add a few lines filling those gaps in the "supposed "or "intended" functioning of all those things. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Character Builds & Optimization
5e. Repeling blast nerfed in our game. Help me to rebuild my Bard-Lock
Top