Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="aramis erak" data-source="post: 8881923" data-attributes="member: 6779310">Potentially, yes. Not all companies have enlightened approaches to 3rd party.Palladium Books/Kevin Siembieda&nbsp; is notoriously hostile to 3rd party. Sued over a conversion in a 3rd party book, settled for an undisclosed amount and removal from all further copies manufactured.Specifically, three companies are problematic: <ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">WotC - because the HasBro board has given them profit maximization marching orders and it's clear they're aiming to commercialize the licensing</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Palladium, noted above, because Siembieda seems to be a bit of a jerk, and </li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Games Workshop, because no one in the gaming industry comes across as less sane and more greedy than GW.</li>
</ul>PEG (who do Savage Worlds) and SJG (GURPS and The Fantasy Trip) have specific standards which they require 3rd party items meet, even free ones. Check their websites for their specifics.Most of the English speaking publishers won't pursue free materials. In the US,&nbsp; supplements are a kind of gray zone - see TSR v. Mayfair. See also the settled Siembieda DBA Palladium Books v WotC in re Primal Order. See also Amarillo Design Bureau v Companion Games.Of the non-English language publishers, I don't have much specific, but I'll note that France and Germany have different creators rights than the US, UK, and Commonwealth (past/present) nations. So does Japan, despite using a copyright model rather than the Creators Rights model.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="aramis erak, post: 8881923, member: 6779310"] Potentially, yes. Not all companies have enlightened approaches to 3rd party. Palladium Books/Kevin Siembieda is notoriously hostile to 3rd party. Sued over a conversion in a 3rd party book, settled for an undisclosed amount and removal from all further copies manufactured. Specifically, three companies are problematic: [LIST] [*]WotC - because the HasBro board has given them profit maximization marching orders and it's clear they're aiming to commercialize the licensing [*]Palladium, noted above, because Siembieda seems to be a bit of a jerk, and [*]Games Workshop, because no one in the gaming industry comes across as less sane and more greedy than GW. [/LIST] PEG (who do Savage Worlds) and SJG (GURPS and The Fantasy Trip) have specific standards which they require 3rd party items meet, even free ones. Check their websites for their specifics. Most of the English speaking publishers won't pursue free materials. In the US, supplements are a kind of gray zone - see TSR v. Mayfair. See also the settled Siembieda DBA Palladium Books v WotC in re Primal Order. See also Amarillo Design Bureau v Companion Games. Of the non-English language publishers, I don't have much specific, but I'll note that France and Germany have different creators rights than the US, UK, and Commonwealth (past/present) nations. So does Japan, despite using a copyright model rather than the Creators Rights model. [/QUOTE]

Verification