Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
5e "Skill" Checks
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Raunalyn" data-source="post: 5927821" data-attributes="member: 72670"><p>Ok, reading over the rules, I noticed that all of the "skills" are flat bonuses that are applied to a check whenever a character performs a relevant action. For example, if a rogue tries to sneak past the guard, he would roll his Dex check and add a flat +3 bonus to the roll. Good so far.</p><p> </p><p>However, I noticed that none of the "skills" are actually tied to a relevant ability. Maybe I'm behind the curve on this, but it makes a lot of sense to me.</p><p></p><p>Let's go back to the rogue and give him a hypothetical bonus to Intimidate checks. In previous editions, Intimidation was always tied to Charisma...I never liked that. Sure, I can see a rogue interrogating a goblin, using his guile and sharp wit to scare the goblin into submission. That would use Charisma. But what if the burly fighter with a low charisma where to do it? Wouldn't be very effective. </p><p></p><p>In the new rules, the fighter could use his Strength to intimidate. Maybe he uses his strength to show the goblin what he can do to its spine with just his hands.</p><p></p><p>The skill system allows for players to think creatively, using their strengths to more effectively utilize their abilities. A player doesn't have a high Wisdom, so he's less perceptive? I disagree...a highly Intelligent character would know what to look for.</p><p></p><p>I like this...a lot. What are your opinions?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Raunalyn, post: 5927821, member: 72670"] Ok, reading over the rules, I noticed that all of the "skills" are flat bonuses that are applied to a check whenever a character performs a relevant action. For example, if a rogue tries to sneak past the guard, he would roll his Dex check and add a flat +3 bonus to the roll. Good so far. However, I noticed that none of the "skills" are actually tied to a relevant ability. Maybe I'm behind the curve on this, but it makes a lot of sense to me. Let's go back to the rogue and give him a hypothetical bonus to Intimidate checks. In previous editions, Intimidation was always tied to Charisma...I never liked that. Sure, I can see a rogue interrogating a goblin, using his guile and sharp wit to scare the goblin into submission. That would use Charisma. But what if the burly fighter with a low charisma where to do it? Wouldn't be very effective. In the new rules, the fighter could use his Strength to intimidate. Maybe he uses his strength to show the goblin what he can do to its spine with just his hands. The skill system allows for players to think creatively, using their strengths to more effectively utilize their abilities. A player doesn't have a high Wisdom, so he's less perceptive? I disagree...a highly Intelligent character would know what to look for. I like this...a lot. What are your opinions? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
5e "Skill" Checks
Top