Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Rechan" data-source="post: 5783199" data-attributes="member: 54846">As long as there is player material beyond one book, there will always be DMs saying &quot;now I have to disallow stuff&quot;. Hell, there are DMs who say no to core stuff if it differs from the campaign they are running (see: the monk debate, Dark Sun and its divine classes). And there will always be players who want to play the stuff the DM doesn't like. Regardless of where the content is located.Honestly, I've always felt that 3rd party products are useless for player content because no DM I've ever met would allow anything from anything non-WotC.God forbid a DM look at the actual rule and decide if it's OP or not, rather than say &quot;Ew, it's touching other content I don't like because it's packaged in that article/book, it's tainted&quot;.Hell, I feel fine with banning elves/dwarves/halflings/gnomes (and rules relating to them) if it doesn't fit my campaign.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Rechan, post: 5783199, member: 54846"] As long as there is player material beyond one book, there will always be DMs saying "now I have to disallow stuff". Hell, there are DMs who say no to core stuff if it differs from the campaign they are running (see: the monk debate, Dark Sun and its divine classes). And there will always be players who want to play the stuff the DM doesn't like. [B]Regardless of where the content is located[/B]. Honestly, I've always felt that 3rd party products are useless for player content because no DM I've ever met would allow anything from anything non-WotC. God forbid a DM look at the actual rule and decide if it's OP or not, rather than say "Ew, it's touching other content I don't like because it's packaged in that article/book, it's tainted". Hell, I feel fine with banning elves/dwarves/halflings/gnomes (and rules relating to them) if it doesn't fit my campaign. [/QUOTE]

Verification