Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Matthan" data-source="post: 6720050" data-attributes="member: 20005">I don't know.&nbsp; I've never really read anything about the Binder before looking at the thread.&nbsp; I knew it had a precedent in 3.5, but I've never read the book.&nbsp; When I was reading the pdf for the campaign, I saw the voodoo threads, thought of riding Loas, and thought of that class as a cool way to express that.&nbsp; I'll go a step farther and say I don't know how to reflect that passage in the class as written.&nbsp; My thought was that the lesser Loas were willing to work with me to increase their power in some way and move up the hierarchy.&nbsp; Flavor wise, I can do that with a single vestige/loa, but I don't think the class as a whole works if you do that.&nbsp; The designer assumes multiple loas to balance the class.&nbsp; I don't know how to fix that.&nbsp; &nbsp; All that said, I very much do not want to step onto Steeleye's niche as the voodoo priestess.&nbsp; I'd rather come up with a new concept than that.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Matthan, post: 6720050, member: 20005"] I don't know. I've never really read anything about the Binder before looking at the thread. I knew it had a precedent in 3.5, but I've never read the book. When I was reading the pdf for the campaign, I saw the voodoo threads, thought of riding Loas, and thought of that class as a cool way to express that. I'll go a step farther and say I don't know how to reflect that passage in the class as written. My thought was that the lesser Loas were willing to work with me to increase their power in some way and move up the hierarchy. Flavor wise, I can do that with a single vestige/loa, but I don't think the class as a whole works if you do that. The designer assumes multiple loas to balance the class. I don't know how to fix that. All that said, I very much do not want to step onto Steeleye's niche as the voodoo priestess. I'd rather come up with a new concept than that. [/QUOTE]

Verification