Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Zardnaar" data-source="post: 9776574" data-attributes="member: 6716779">I just find it funny. Somehow 4E great, a handful of raging grognards sunk it and an awful version of D&D was in print for 17 years.  Some more information has come to light though. The more complicated editions didnt sell that well. The less complicated ones have.  Also most games dont go that high in level and forum members are extreme minority.  I dont think the vast majority of gamers had much of a issue with 3.5 only forum users.  If most gamers only have phb and most games finish by level 7 (I suspect this was true back then) there's not much wrong with 3.5 except its fiddle.  Most of 3.5 big issues involve higher level play and splat book abuse most of which was theory crafting. It explains a lot. Another theory is dont make a product that provokes a backlash from your own customers. Pick your poison.</blockquote>