Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Avalongod" data-source="post: 6874642" data-attributes="member: 68229">Yeah it's sort of like taxes, mosquitoes or the impending death that awaits us all in that respect isn't it?&nbsp; The Vancian aspect was definitely &quot;nominal&quot; to say the least.&nbsp; It was a totally different animal which is why I'd forgotten it was my point.&nbsp; They called it a wizard, but calling 2 things by the same name doesn't necessarily mean they are all that similar.Sorc got screwed in 3e because they got spell levels later than wizard and who wanted to wait 1 more level to get fireball?&nbsp; I'd say sorcs and wizards actually feel pretty balanced against each other in 5e...just they both feel a little screwed at the higher levels.&nbsp; I maintain my position on how it could be fixed for better balancing.&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Avalongod, post: 6874642, member: 68229"] Yeah it's sort of like taxes, mosquitoes or the impending death that awaits us all in that respect isn't it? The Vancian aspect was definitely "nominal" to say the least. It was a totally different animal which is why I'd forgotten it was my point. They called it a wizard, but calling 2 things by the same name doesn't necessarily mean they are all that similar. Sorc got screwed in 3e because they got spell levels later than wizard and who wanted to wait 1 more level to get fireball? I'd say sorcs and wizards actually feel pretty balanced against each other in 5e...just they both feel a little screwed at the higher levels. I maintain my position on how it could be fixed for better balancing. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification