Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
5th Edition has broken Bounded Accuracy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 6631633" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>Therein lies the question though-- if those feats are indeed "very broken" to a certain subset of players (that subset which are playing in the late 3rd / 4th tier and who are focusing their party around giving the GWM/SS feat holder the best chance for success)... is that very broken *enough* to warrant actually changing the game in its entirety through errata?</p><p></p><p>My guess is the answer from WotC's p.o.v. will be "No". Reason being... the "fix" to a numerical issue that only a certain segment of the players was finding will end up being more of an issue to a greater number of people. The solution being worse than the problem-- the old "Weapon Focus Feat" conundrum. Wherein WotC decision's to try and fix a slight damage imbalance in the 4E math resulted in the creation of a fix that ended up pissing more people off and causing more conflict that the original issue itself did. And I would suspect that any official change to GWM/SS runs the same risk to the rest of the D&D population.</p><p></p><p>The fact that the game itself tells you to make any changes you need to it for your own best experience is really all that they need to do to "fix" this problem. Any DM and table who finds themselves having these GWM/SS issues can make their own ruling to counteract the issue, rather than WotC needing to write down an "official" change that affects <em>everybody</em>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 6631633, member: 7006"] Therein lies the question though-- if those feats are indeed "very broken" to a certain subset of players (that subset which are playing in the late 3rd / 4th tier and who are focusing their party around giving the GWM/SS feat holder the best chance for success)... is that very broken *enough* to warrant actually changing the game in its entirety through errata? My guess is the answer from WotC's p.o.v. will be "No". Reason being... the "fix" to a numerical issue that only a certain segment of the players was finding will end up being more of an issue to a greater number of people. The solution being worse than the problem-- the old "Weapon Focus Feat" conundrum. Wherein WotC decision's to try and fix a slight damage imbalance in the 4E math resulted in the creation of a fix that ended up pissing more people off and causing more conflict that the original issue itself did. And I would suspect that any official change to GWM/SS runs the same risk to the rest of the D&D population. The fact that the game itself tells you to make any changes you need to it for your own best experience is really all that they need to do to "fix" this problem. Any DM and table who finds themselves having these GWM/SS issues can make their own ruling to counteract the issue, rather than WotC needing to write down an "official" change that affects [i]everybody[/i]. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
5th Edition has broken Bounded Accuracy
Top