Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="spinozajack" data-source="post: 6632474" data-attributes="member: 6794198">Because the game is like totally perfect and only has a couple unclear passages to fix and that's it <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />When I heard they weren't going to issue any functional errata I thought to myself, ok here is a big blunder. They went completely the opposite direction from 4e which had monthly errata that were so disruptive to campaigns that relied on the builder and so had no choice but to stay at the bleeding edge. But now, they've gone in the complete opposite direction of no errata.Probably a testament to the quality of the Seattle Hafling Leaf they got up there.All they've done here is in effect the same kind of &quot;feat tax&quot; or use player glut to fix other broken stuff. I bet any money there will be a feat to make close range great weapons competitive with polearms again, and then another that will make dual wielding competitive with polearms. Instead of actually fixing the problem and removing the bonus attack from polearm master and making GWM not work with reach weapons. Those two fixes would immediately rebalance the game where feats are concerned.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="spinozajack, post: 6632474, member: 6794198"] Because the game is like totally perfect and only has a couple unclear passages to fix and that's it :) When I heard they weren't going to issue any functional errata I thought to myself, ok here is a big blunder. They went completely the opposite direction from 4e which had monthly errata that were so disruptive to campaigns that relied on the builder and so had no choice but to stay at the bleeding edge. But now, they've gone in the complete opposite direction of no errata. Probably a testament to the quality of the Seattle Hafling Leaf they got up there. All they've done here is in effect the same kind of "feat tax" or use player glut to fix other broken stuff. I bet any money there will be a feat to make close range great weapons competitive with polearms again, and then another that will make dual wielding competitive with polearms. Instead of actually fixing the problem and removing the bonus attack from polearm master and making GWM not work with reach weapons. Those two fixes would immediately rebalance the game where feats are concerned. [/QUOTE]

Verification