Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Sacrosanct" data-source="post: 6634026" data-attributes="member: 15700">I disagree that there's a problem with the warrior, and here's why.&nbsp; If I want to play a warrior, I have choices that are already there in the game.&nbsp; I can be super effective at ranged, at melee, or be pretty effective in both.If I choose to specialize in being super effective in melee, then that's my choice and what comes along with it--less effective in ranged compared to someone who specialized there or is more general.&nbsp; If you take the position that someone who specializes narrowly should also be very effective outside of their specialization, then you end up with everyone complaining about how X is too powerful and the game is broken.Now, if there weren't any options for me to play a fighter who was very effective in ranged, I'd agree with you.&nbsp; But there are options.&nbsp; Many of them in fact.&nbsp; A whole subclass actually.This whole other argument is basically the same rehash of the &quot;I'm playing a cleric and I can only cast healing spells because all the other players expect me to.&quot;&nbsp; Throw in a bunch of other statements like begin stuck to cast only healing spells and nothing else for fear of repercussions, and I say that's a whole lot of bollocks.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Sacrosanct, post: 6634026, member: 15700"] I disagree that there's a problem with the warrior, and here's why. If I want to play a warrior, I have choices that are already there in the game. I can be super effective at ranged, at melee, or be pretty effective in both. If I [i]choose[/i] to specialize in being super effective in melee, then that's my choice and what comes along with it--less effective in ranged compared to someone who specialized there or is more general. If you take the position that someone who specializes narrowly should also be very effective outside of their specialization, then you end up with everyone complaining about how X is too powerful and the game is broken. Now, if there weren't any options for me to play a fighter who was very effective in ranged, I'd agree with you. But there are options. Many of them in fact. A whole subclass actually. This whole other argument is basically the same rehash of the "I'm playing a cleric and I can only cast healing spells because all the other players expect me to." Throw in a bunch of other statements like begin stuck to cast only healing spells and nothing else for fear of repercussions, and I say that's a whole lot of bollocks. [/QUOTE]

Verification