Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DaveDash" data-source="post: 6639312" data-attributes="member: 6786202">You're a theory crafter. You come up with some interesting but inherently flawed white room scenarios.I'm still waiting to hear from you how your &quot;winning&quot; strategy of 30 skeletons would have been effective at all in the Shadow Dragon fight I ran. Even in the Dragon fight last night your &quot;winning&quot; strategies would have been totally useless as we were funneled down a dark tunnel towards the Dragons lair, making all your skeletons breath weapon mince meat.Hunting through the book coming up with unproven maths doesn't make you Sun Tzu - sorry.I eagerly await some actual play experiences in game of your tactical genius. Just because the maths says it works, doesn't actually means it works, and there's the weakness and disconnect in your thought process. In fact tactics has very little to do with maths and much more to do with maximising your strengths and minimizing your weaknesses. The fact you can't comprehend a Dragon ignoring 20 archers and dropping rocks on them from height illustrates your inherently flawed thinking, because the maths doesnt cater for that.Your posts amuse me and remind me of a bit of the Whiz Kids in the Vietnam War. &quot;The numbers we calculated say we should be winning, why aren't we?!&quot;</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DaveDash, post: 6639312, member: 6786202"] You're a theory crafter. You come up with some interesting but inherently flawed white room scenarios. I'm still waiting to hear from you how your "winning" strategy of 30 skeletons would have been effective at all in the Shadow Dragon fight I ran. Even in the Dragon fight last night your "winning" strategies would have been totally useless as we were funneled down a dark tunnel towards the Dragons lair, making all your skeletons breath weapon mince meat. Hunting through the book coming up with unproven maths doesn't make you Sun Tzu - sorry. I eagerly await some actual play experiences in game of your tactical genius. Just because the maths says it works, doesn't actually means it works, and there's the weakness and disconnect in your thought process. In fact tactics has very little to do with maths and much more to do with maximising your strengths and minimizing your weaknesses. The fact you can't comprehend a Dragon ignoring 20 archers and dropping rocks on them from height illustrates your inherently flawed thinking, because the maths doesnt cater for that. Your posts amuse me and remind me of a bit of the Whiz Kids in the Vietnam War. "The numbers we calculated say we should be winning, why aren't we?!" [/QUOTE]

Verification