Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
6-8 encounters (combat?)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Iosue" data-source="post: 8769438" data-attributes="member: 6680772"><p>While not necessarily disputing anything you wrote, I would say that dungeons play a very significant role in the design, even though they seem to be given short shrift in these discussions. 3-4 encounters per day sounds good if you're talking about a plot-driven adventure, or a city-based adventure. It would be far too low for a dungeon-based adventure.</p><p></p><p>I'll also note that people act like 6-8 combat encounters is this crazy, impossible number. Yet Lost Mine of Phandelver, probably the most well-received and universally praised adventure put out by WotC for 5e, is very much along those lines. You have:</p><p></p><p>Day 1: Goblin ambush and Cragmaw Hideout (6-7 combat encounters)</p><p>Day 2: Redbrand Hideout (7 combat encounters)</p><p>Day 3: Ruins of Thundertree (9 combat encounters, not counting the dragon!)</p><p>Day 4: Cragmaw Castle (9-10 combat encounters)</p><p>Day 5: Wave Echo Cave (10 combat encounters)</p><p></p><p>Certainly, not of these encounters will happen, nor will all encounters that do happen necessarily lead to combat. But certainly this is proof of design? It may not be what everyone wants, it may not even be the playstyle in fashion 8 years into 5e's life, but I don't think it can reasonably said that WotC's math was unrealistic, or even boring and out-of-fashion given LMoP's reception. </p><p></p><p></p><p>I'll certainly not gainsay others' experiences, but this has never been mine, among 3 or 4 different groups. The short rest is so short and unobtrusive, and yet beneficial to the entire party, that even if it wasn't handled as part of passage of time between set-piece encounters, I've never seen any arguments. Someone suggests a short rest, and everyone's like, "Sure. I wouldn't mind rolling some hit dice." My groups have all tended to just naturally fall into the pattern of 2-3 combat encounters, short rest, 2-3 combat encounters, short rest, 2-3 combat encounters, long rest. With variance depending on difficulty, of course.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Iosue, post: 8769438, member: 6680772"] While not necessarily disputing anything you wrote, I would say that dungeons play a very significant role in the design, even though they seem to be given short shrift in these discussions. 3-4 encounters per day sounds good if you're talking about a plot-driven adventure, or a city-based adventure. It would be far too low for a dungeon-based adventure. I'll also note that people act like 6-8 combat encounters is this crazy, impossible number. Yet Lost Mine of Phandelver, probably the most well-received and universally praised adventure put out by WotC for 5e, is very much along those lines. You have: Day 1: Goblin ambush and Cragmaw Hideout (6-7 combat encounters) Day 2: Redbrand Hideout (7 combat encounters) Day 3: Ruins of Thundertree (9 combat encounters, not counting the dragon!) Day 4: Cragmaw Castle (9-10 combat encounters) Day 5: Wave Echo Cave (10 combat encounters) Certainly, not of these encounters will happen, nor will all encounters that do happen necessarily lead to combat. But certainly this is proof of design? It may not be what everyone wants, it may not even be the playstyle in fashion 8 years into 5e's life, but I don't think it can reasonably said that WotC's math was unrealistic, or even boring and out-of-fashion given LMoP's reception. I'll certainly not gainsay others' experiences, but this has never been mine, among 3 or 4 different groups. The short rest is so short and unobtrusive, and yet beneficial to the entire party, that even if it wasn't handled as part of passage of time between set-piece encounters, I've never seen any arguments. Someone suggests a short rest, and everyone's like, "Sure. I wouldn't mind rolling some hit dice." My groups have all tended to just naturally fall into the pattern of 2-3 combat encounters, short rest, 2-3 combat encounters, short rest, 2-3 combat encounters, long rest. With variance depending on difficulty, of course. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
6-8 encounters (combat?)
Top